Rich flocking to real estate

November 30, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Barclays survey shows people with more than $800,000 to invest are steering clear of stocks and bonds, and moving into real estate. Click here to see a story about the survey.

The wealthier the person, the more likely they are to prefer real estate, the British bank found. One reason is, they believe real estate, both residential and commercial, is a good investment given the depressed prices.

Aside from their home country, the respondents felt the United States held the greatest real estate opportunities.

What about the Indianapolis area? Would you rather have your money in local real estate or in stocks and bonds?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • I'll take bonds
    Indy real estate is likely to show a growth of less that 4% per year for the near future.
  • Lemmings.....
    And the "rich" are never wrong...
    TRUE - Real estate is considered more of a "tangible" investment because the investor can physically and visually assess the asset.
    FALSE - Real estate is a safer investment with more upside and less volatility than stocks/bonds.
    Despite what the NAR - National Association of Realtors (aka National Association of Racketeers) may suggest (without bias of course), real estate has not yet bottomed. If you disagree and see the Obama plan as inspiring economic growth & prosperity, then I am sure you will become a millionaire, assuming you are already a billionaire.
  • Recreation
    Stocks come and go (up and down), but a good piece of real estate cannot be recreated. Although it is a risk, keep in mind urban sprawl, urban renewal, and rural development. Just do not consider real estate a very liquid asset as it takes time to turn.
  • Pending
    All investments (housing, stocks, bonds, gold, etc) are all about timing. Reguardless if you are buying into one thing or another, it is an investment of sorts. For instance, If you decide to (right out of the gate), rent - you will get an easy pay in - no pay out (out side of instant living space). But if you buy a house, you will get a pay in - and pending on market and the investment along the way, pay out lower, higher, or even out from what your buy in market value.

    Granted, the house investments are much longer than your stocks/bonds investments, but all investments are risks, risks you will have to weigh yourself on. This is not a Democrat issue, not a Republican issue, but an issue of how YOU are investing YOUR money in whatever market you invest in. Just gotta act responsibly and wise when investing in the given market.

    Since I am new in the market, I am looking more towards a home than stocks or bonds right now. I can get more use out of a home. Granted, I will have alot more investment in my end, but I will have more (not complete, but) control of the investment output because of that.

    Tell me, Joe Schmoe, Do you own stocks/bonds or even a home? If so, when did you put yourself into that(those) investment(s)? Was it during the worst time in the market (at a high point)? I will agree that we haven't seen the bottom of the housing market yet, but no matter what, we will always need a place to live.
  • I'll take risk
    Predicting the bottom is worthless. RE Traders don't make $ by predicting the bottom, they make it by purchasing on a swing. Aiming for the bottom is obvious but buying just before the turnaround or on the way up is the goal. Same with selling, sell near the top, don't guess when you're there-otherwise, you could be the idiot with a bunch of property in the next downturn with nobody to occupy/buy it (see Duke). If that's too risky, I'll sell you a bond and give you back a bond + 1% in 5 years.
  • Land
    "Stocks may rise and fall, utilities and transportation systems may collapse, people are no damned good... but they will always need land, and they'll pay through the nose to get it."
    â??Lex Luthor

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT