Even Bentley sales are down

December 16, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Blessings in disguise are always nice. Especially when you sell super-luxury cars like Rolls-Royce and Bentley.

Greg and Mark Albers handled both marques at their tiny Zionsville dealership until 2003, when BMW acquired the Rolls-Royce name and wanted the brothers to build a separate location for the venerable British brand.

The Albers opted to ditch Rolls-Royce because, at prices starting near $350,000, they wouldn’t have sold enough of the cars to recover the investment. Not many local people are comfortable with such conspicuous consumption.

But Bentley was another matter. More understated and cheaper—they started at $150,000—the brothers made their choice.

Today, car sales at Albers Bentley Zionsville are down two-thirds from 2007, Greg Albers says. But that’s a lot better than any separate Rolls-Royce dealership would have fared.

Bentley buyers are still the same entrepreneurs and business owners. There are just fewer of them kicking tires.

Most are biding their time, waiting for the economy to turn around, Albers says. Meanwhile, if they want a new car, they’re dropping back to a Mercedes or BMW.

Albers is amused when people suggest his customers can buy whatever they want, whenever they want it. The truth is that, while the customers are wealthy compared to the average person, their wealth fluctuates, and they become reluctant to spend when their businesses aren’t doing well.

“These are smart people. Most of them have money because they’ve been wise about it,” he says. “They’re not going to spend money foolishly.”

Despite the downdraft in car sales, the dealership has laid no one off because it continues to sell parts for vintage cars and repairs both brands. In the case of Rolls-Royce, it repairs only cars through the 2002 model year.

Any thoughts about buying expensive cars in times like these? Do you wish the Albers still sold Rolls-Royce?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Re
    You mean Tim Durham has defied the odds of those wealthy people by continuing to spend, spend, spend?

    Oh yeah, maybe it's easy to spend when it's not your money.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT