Falcone mourning Saab

December 18, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Bob Falcone, who was the only Saab dealer in the Indianapolis area until he closed in April, says he could foresee today’s announcement that General Motors would kill the brand.

Falcone swung a deal with Fifth Third Bank to unload his $5 million in Saab inventory and close the dealership in exchange for the bank’s financing his takeover of the former Duke Gold Volkswagen Subaru on the outskirts of downtown.

But Falcone is still mourning the passage of a brand he sold for 20 years and continues to service at Falcone Volkswagen Subaru & Saab Service.

“I’m crushed and heartbroken beyond a shadow of a doubt. But I’m going to survive this,” he says. “I’m just very glad to be a survivor.”

General Motors announced it would stop trying to find a buyer for Saab after it decided earlier this year to unload the brand as part of its turnaround strategy. Dutch sports car maker Spyker Cars has rebuffed GM after a Swedish sports car manufacturer, Koenigsegg, turned down an offer to buy Saab in November.

Falcone thinks Saab would still be a going concern if GM hadn’t insisted on such hooks as forcing buyers to continue using GM platforms.

Nevertheless, it’s over. Falcone sold 600 cars a year, making him the 7th-largest Saab dealer in the nation. He also often was recognized by the company for heavily outselling rivals Volvo and Audi in the Indianapolis market.

Saab buyers were a tough crowd, Falcone recalls. They ranked among the highest—if not the highest—users of the Internet. So, they made decisions slowly and deliberately. Not the kind of people who respond well to high pressure.

But Falcone is heartened that a number of former customers are moving with him to Volkswagen and Subaru even though few, if any, of the models of either brand are considered entry-level luxury buys. The Saab customers are splitting their choices roughly evenly between Volkswagen CC sedans and Subaru Legacy and Outbacks.

“I will be 100 percent fine,” he says.

What are your thoughts about the end of Saab? Of Falcone’s migration to Volkswagen and Subaru?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Saab Story...
    joeDecember 18, 2009 12:59 PM
    ...it's too bad that GM screwed Saab too...while I never owned one (Volvo driving liberal of course) always thought they were unique and solid cars, plus more affordable and practical than the high-end German cars. I understand Hummer and Pontiac getting axed but Saturn and Saab were worth saving for a number of reasons...and the GM execs that did these deals are all long gone with their golden parachutes!!!
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • sob story
    PaulDecember 18, 2009 2:13 PM
    Sob story....whoops!... I mean SAAB story.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Screw GM
    KurtDecember 19, 2009 7:15 AM
    GM sucks. They screwed over Saturn [personal favorite] and Saab. Makes me want to consider changing vehicle brands. GM's screwing over Saturn was a big middle finger to some of the most loyal customers the american automotive world has seen. I'm giving that middle finger right back to the fact cats at RenCen. Ford is looking better and better every day.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Even though
    JoeDecember 21, 2009 12:30 PM
    Even though I never owned a Saturn or SAAB, I still held them with the up most respect. I have been a chevy man, but if worst came to worst and I had to choose a different vehicle (when they exists), I would have gone with Saturn or SAAB for reliability.

    Just like some of the other comments, I can see Hummers going down. They were monstrous machines which had a bad rep. But Saturn and SAAB? Not just that, but back in 2003, Chevy Axed the S10 and replaced it with the (what is called) new truck. Are they trying to kill themselves?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

  1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

  2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

  3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

  4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

  5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

ADVERTISEMENT