Real estate commissions

December 30, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

You’d think the uptick in sales of entry-level housing this year might be welcome relief for real estate agents and brokers, but think again.

Nationally, commissions crept up to 5.29 percent this year, but the dollar value of commissions actually receded to its lowest level in seven years. Realtors sold more houses, but because so many first-time buyers came into the market, the average sale price of the houses plunged. As a result, overall income shrank, according to a Bloomberg News story.

David Brenton has seen good times and bad in his nearly two decades of selling houses full-time, and he’s been able to hold pat on commissions since the late ’90s, ranging from 5.75 percent to 10 percent depending on the home.

Brenton, a broker associate at Re/Max Select Realtors in Greenwood, says potential clients have agitated for lower commissions since inflation ebbed nearly a generation back. Low inflation and only modest increases in home values mean owners have built less equity, so they want to cut costs as much as possible during a sale.

However, Brenton has been able to convince them that he’s worth the money. Anyone can sell a house in good times, he says; in bad times, experience counts.

“Clients need a Realtor’s services in a market like this more than in a market that’s booming,” he says.

Are you seeing changes in commissions? And what about real estate brokers, themselves? How do you value their services?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Realtors are On the Way Out
    The old days of realtors providing substantial service are gone. Today the buyer does the research, tells the agent or agents which houses he or she wants to see, knows the value of the neighborhood, and has already arranged financing. The advances in the Internet will continue to shrink the ranks of realtors who think they are worth so much and as a four time buyer and seller in 20 years, it's about time.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT