Census surprises

January 4, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The 2010 census launches today, but details of the findings won’t be available until spring of 2011. Carol Rogers, an Indiana University demographer with a focus on the state, is watching for the following surprises:

— The Latino population in the Indianapolis area will be significantly larger than it was in the 2000 census, possibly 20 percent greater, Rogers says. In the past census, 2.7 percent of the region’s 1.5 million people were Latino. (In this example and the one below, the figures are for 2000 data accounting for the new Indianapolis-Carmel Metropolitan Statistical Area of Marion and surrounding counties along with Brown and Putnam counties.)

— Also in the Indianapolis area, homeownership rates will fall a few points from the 62.4 percent in 2000, Rogers predicts. Marion County, which has long had more renters due to the high number of college students and young people moving into the region, will see a surge in renters due to the foreclosure crisis.

— Head counts in densely populated unincorporated areas will jump. The place Rogers is watching most closely is Granger, a wealthy enclave outside South Bend that had exploded to 28,284 people as of the last census. People have moved to unincorporated areas—Fairland in Shelby County is one local example—to be able to afford more property. The residents also tend to want proximity to cities and their amenities while avoiding taxes for police and other services.

— Seymour, the city along Interstate 65 roughly halfway between Indianapolis and Louisville, probably has grown more than many people realize, Rogers says. Seymour had 18,101 residents during the last count, and has prospered largely through aggression of long-time economic development leader Jim Plump.

Thoughts on Rogers’ predictions?

How to you feel about participating in the census? Any hesitations?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Census Participation is Important
    I think that these predictions are on the money. Indiana will certainly see a significant rise in the Latino population, as will much of the country. I would add that we can expect to see that Indianaâ??s population has grown faster throughout the decade than neighboring Illinois, Michigan and Ohio thanks to a more dynamic economic landscape here.

    I donâ??t have any reservations about participating in the Census. The information determines Indianaâ??s representation in congress, the amount of federal funds we receive and provides important data for public service and economic development planning.
  • Census
    The US Census, appropriately conducted by the US Censless Bureau had much more direct benefit in regard to distribution of federal funds years ago. Congressional brokering, earmark bribes, and fattening of the congressional hogs should tell you that there is little chance anything will ever be fair unless we, the voters, find a way to change the way business is misconducted in Washington.

    The "change" we've seen did not live up to the promise of the "change" messiah. Remember the promise of NO MORE EARMARKS in my administration. Yeah, sure, buddy.

    And, oh, if we could only say NO to the CZARS. This is just wrong and has been a misdeed of both parties just as both are to blame for the mess we are enduring in Congress.

    Oink, oink...........
  • Ovbious
    the information which will come out in the 2010 census - should not be a surprise. More people in the state, Less home owners, more renters. Race, Politics, Religion, and Professional shifts in various areas. If you have been awake the past 10 or so years, there should not be much of a supprise or shock.

    My question is, how long and how often do people hold houses (especially within the past 10 years)? I knew a few people who moved about 2-4 times within the last ten years and this is not completely due to the current crisis, but due to the fact of job changes, educational changes, or other personal reasons.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT