Indianapolis resentment

January 18, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Nearly a week has passed since the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute released a study showing urban counties in the state pay more in state taxes than they receive in benefits. In effect, tax revenue flows from cities to rural areas, Ball State University found.

The methodology has been criticized, mainly by people living in rural counties, but the results reflect similar studies in other states.

The study has both confirmed what people in the Indianapolis area have said for a long time—that funding flows are reasonably equitable—and rekindled discussion about the perpetual resentment toward Indianapolis.

State Rep. Bob Behning, a Plainfield Republican, says anti-Indianapolis sentiment is running at about the same fairly high level as when he was elected to the office in 1993. Behning’s District 91 includes parts of Marion and Morgan counties as well as a section of Hendricks County, which was second behind Vanderburgh County in paying more tax than it received.

He witnessed Indianapolis resentment surfacing again during the competition between Marian University in Indianapolis and Indiana Wesleyan University in Marion over the new osteopathic medical school snagged by Marian. One representative from the Marion area suggested Indiana Wesleyan should have gotten it because “Indianapolis has so many things, why don’t we share,” Behning recalls.

“Because people come from varied backgrounds in different communities, there will always be jealousy,” he says. However, Behning adds that Indianapolis is perceived as dragging too many of its problems, such as the Capital Improvement Board’s financial mess, to the doors of the Statehouse.

Nevertheless, he believes most of the resentment is unjustified. Indianapolis gets lots of attention because of its size and the unique issues it contends with—professional sports, for example. And for those same reasons it will for a long time to come.

What’s your take? Does the Indianapolis area get more than its fair share of the pot from the General Assembly? Are there legitimate reasons for the resentment?


 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • My take on Indy
    I think Indy should get more money from the General Assumbly. We live in a time where regions and large cities propel state economies. If you want to attract professional jobs, than you have to be able to put a great product on the table. Indy is the only city in Indiana that has star power right now. Our second biggest city has a laughable downtown, how do expect people to want to live in a city like that? Spend the money where you will get a return-INDY!
    • Out Growth Cost $20 Million Per Mile
      Mayor Brainard USGBC Speech / SMART GROWTH vs:

      The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of a Nation: and our State

      Sustainable Cityâ??s / Solve City Design Issues / Recreate Walkable Cityâ??s

      By Design: Happy Cars 1 to 5 Mile Grid vs. Happy People Walkable Grid
      No Connectivity; No Grid; Congestions traffic solution: Widen & More Roads????
      Land Capacity vs. Access Capacity / Loss of Quality of Life / Loss of Time /
      2 hrs of Traffic per day

      Bankrupting many Local and State Governments
      Creates: Abandon Housing / Crime / Historic Measures

      Facts:
      Average Household Drives 100 miles Per Day
      Average Lot size = .3 Acre
      Current rate of expansion in U.S. America = 0 Acres left by 2050
      Cost of Transportation / Energy Savings / Drainage Use / Etc.
      Once upon a time: Corner Stores â?? Goshen Indiana (Walk to work)
      Candy Store; Gelato; Bakery; Restaurants; Pharmacy; Coffee = Neighborhoods
      Auto% of households that have cars:
      1895â??1905 1920 1930 1950 1960 Today
      Start of Auto 25% Depression 50% 90% 2.5 cars per household
      â?¦..Not Sustainable Financially / (COSTS:)
      Roads = $5.2 Million per 1 Mile + Land + Sewer + Water + Utilities ++++
      Costs are hidden to Subsidize Sprawl: Road Out; Fire; Police; Utilities; Schools etc.
      = $20 Mil. Per Mile / Expense Spent Towards Out Growth
      ���Creating the Fiscal Problems of Today
      Solutions = â??Public & Private Partnership Investments Help Cities Growâ?? â?? Hudnut

      Solutions by Design:
      Urban Growth Boundaryâ??s / Force Public Investment Capital Back into Center

      Infill / Reconnect to the Center / Public Redevelopment Tool Box:
      Environmental Clean Up
      Housing
      Infrastructure
      Energy Sustainability
      Economic Development

      Solutions: Better Quality of Life / by Design:
      City & State Spending $ where they can get return on investment
      Create better Walkable road systems with in our walkable community
      Complete the Streets with Multi Modes of transportation
      Density Done Well â?? Mixed Use with in our Historic Commercial Nodes
      Pocket Parks â?? Reconnect our Neighborhoods our communityâ??s and our people.

      Cityâ??s and Neighborhoods that are walkable are the ones that will succeed
      Demand Reinvestment into the Center of our most dense locations and communityâ??s vs. Sprawl The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of a Nationâ?¦Subsidized by the foreign investment

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT