Indy turns architectural corner

February 8, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

It’s hard to miss the new J.W. Marriott downtown as workers add the skin and continue finishing the exterior. The building is tall by local standards—34 floors—and the dark blue glazing contrasts against the limestone and light colors of other downtown buildings.

That’s a good thing, says Ball State University architecture professor Michel Mounayar. The hotel design, which Mounayar describes as “exciting,” is another in a string of recent examples of clients’ allowing architects more latitude to create buildings showing Indianapolis is “not a shy place.”

The new terminal at Indianapolis International Airport and the Central Library expansion are two other recent examples of more expansive thinking, he says. So are some of the buildings at White River State Park.

“Indianapolis is kind of showing an evolutionary kind of face, saying, ‘Look at us, we’re one of the best places in the region to locate,’” Mounayar says. The Marriott “creates a sense of freshness to Indianapolis. It also makes it feel like a contemporary place. It’s really good for the image of the city.”

The Marriott, the airport terminal and the library expansion are a step beyond several “classy” buildings added to the downtown in recent years, he says. Emmis Communications’ headquarters on Monument Circle and the Simon Property Group’s headquarters nearby both make use of limestone, a traditional local material if ever there was one, while distinguishing themselves as contemporary structures. The Emmis building in particular blends the past and the present well, he says.

Whether more buildings like the Marriott or airport terminal are in the offing depends on public reaction, Mounayar says. Building owners will hesitate to step out if the Marriott draws much criticism.

His bet? People will like what they see. So, Mounayar predicts, “Indianapolis is on the verge of more refreshing.”

What are your thoughts? Do you like what you’ve seen of the Marriott so far? What about Mounayar’s broader observations of Indianapolis residents’ developing a taste for more interesting buildings?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Turning Corners
    Iâ??ve been waiting patiently to offer a productive critique on the J.W. Marriott. I will open my comments with an applause to our city and developers for wanting to be better stewards and advocates for design and architecture. Iâ??m hopeful that these projects will help our city, but question whether it will be enough. Admitting openly that we are turning corners is an admission for having been once been in bad place, which is a good start! I want to thank Norm for his article.

    I will be honest in announcing there is something oddly encouraging in the Marriottâ??s designs overall refusal to erase a style (post-modern) that once tried to deconstruct our classical and conventional urban past. Good, bad, or indifferent, the Marriottâ??s new hotel may appear to be the game changer against this â??shynessâ?? but I believe it is safe to say that turning corners and connecting dots do not always happen at the same time.

    The idea of turning corners is a big responsibility and means not just inviting a public to â??develop a taste for more interesting buildingsâ??, but inviting the public to develop a hunger for more interesting Architecture (capital â??Aâ??) and its ideas of culture, transportation, art, youth, new materials, activism, and innovation to participate and breathe new life into our communities and cores.

    Similar to Cesar Pelliâ??s 1975 Blue solution for West Hollywood (Google: Pacific Design Center // Blue Building) and our 1975 â??Goldâ?? solution for Market Square campus, what we can all agree on is that single colored mirrored glass on an extruded structure still offers a gee wiz moment for us in 2010.

    Perhaps Iâ??m wrong? Maybe we have turned a corner? For me, turning a corner means not continually having our local architects in a secondary position (behind design architect) in a city where local talent has designed buildings all over the world. This aside, a turn in the right direction has to do with a recent local movement currently at play which demanding design ethos be part of our future and all future corner turning scenarios.

    The birth of a new set of rogue designers (plenty), photographers (Dwuayno Robertson), urban theorist (Aaron Renn), artists (Orlando Pelaez), and architects (METHOD) should continuously be called on to help maneuver that turn. We should be encouraging, hiring, and seeking these future rainmakers as the next step in turning all corners. Because design is a hot topic today its potential to polarize at one moment (Lucas Oil Stadium) and reconnect at another (N.Y. High Line) goes hand in hand with whether we should simply be happy about being at the party, or bothered because we didnâ??t show up dressed the right way.

    Architecture under these conditions calls for continual reaction, critique, and education of our public so that blue buildings such as Bernard Tschumiâ??s are always considered as options in our cities growth. A digestible serving of architecture which Tschumi explains, â??captures the energy of the diverse population and eclectic buildings of the lower east side.â?? Tschumiâ??s translation of blue is of course a different taste from our blue, which was described only as tall..localâ?¦34 floorsâ?¦ dark blueâ?¦and contrasts against the limestone and light colors of other downtown buildings. Bottomllineâ?¦itâ??s hard to turn corners when the way we talk about our victories seems static, or blue.

    Congrats once more to our city and its recent achievments. We're here to help when you need us.

Post a comment to this blog

captcha
Please enter the text you see above:
Not sure? Give me another.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Mr. M. would never use this paper to his financial benefit, plus he is to busy bashing Emmis and Simon when he can.
    This is OLD news, unless upcoming investigations by Durham land something with Brizzi involved with these transactions.
    What is most uncomfortable is a public servant who cuts deals to benefit himself, he is brazen in that regard, too open and in many cases reckless. BTY, he used to use National Bank of Indianapolis alot, so I doubt Mr. M is too upset

  2. How new are they? He has won three times at the ballot box, so evidently less than 50% of those who vote dont think he has done much wrong.

    Also, these stories with no attributable quotes to the main people involved at typical IBJ reporting. At a minimum how does the reporter not interview another high profile Commercial Real Estate broker (Paul Dick, Bill French, John Crisp, etc) and get their opinion on the fairness of these deals between the City of Indy and Bales?

    Poor reporting.

  3. Mike, are you kidding me? Do you really think Bales has done nothing wrong? So do you think the driver of a get away car isn't doing anything wrong because he didn't commit the bank robbery?

    How do you think Brizzi got all that money to enter into investment deals with Bales? Bales was clearly buying influence...cutting deals and kicking money back to Brizzi in the form of of investments. Do you think that is legal?

  4. Again, two prime examples of why there should be a multi-year "cooling off" period before public employees can go work at for-profit companies soliciting and lobbying the same employers where they just worked.

  5. Is the IBJ determined to kill Bales' career? I mean, he has done nothing wrong and continues to get slammed on here. This is very upsetting to see. Is Maurer trying to help his son's company out or something? Seriously, wtf?

ADVERTISEMENT