Contorting bank regulators

February 17, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This isn’t a pleasant era to be a bank regulator. Pressures have grown enormous to avoid pushing troubled banks into liquidation, and several deals likely have been struck in Indiana to prevent collapses, says veteran bank observer John Reed.

Reed, who heads David A. Noyes & Co.’s investment banking group, says regulators are doing whatever they can to keep from taking over banks.

Regulators have never liked running banks. What’s changed since the 2008 financial crisis is that the regulators know they’re too thinly staffed to supervise many liquidations. They also know the FDIC is growing depleted.

As a result, Reed says, they’re allowing, and sometimes forcing, banks into things that would have been unusual before the crisis.

First Financial’s sudden takeover of Irwin Bank and Trust Co. is a high-profile example. And Reed has noticed several small banks’ assuming deposit liabilities and acquiring “certain assets” without detailing which assets were and were not acquired.

“You’ll never know in many cases exactly what happened,” he says.

Reed expects to see more contortions.

“We haven’t seen the crest of the wave with commercial real estate,” he says. “All bets are off if we have a double-dip recession.”

Reed emphasizes he isn’t predicting whether or not recession will return, though he says it’s a real possibility.

What’s your take on the banking crisis? How bad will it get before it gets better?

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT