Speculation that Gov. Mitch Daniels will run for president has picked up a few notches since he complained to Washington
reporters a few days ago that potential Republican candidates were majoring in the minors, that they weren’t talking
about critical issues like oil imports and the national debt.
However, if Daniels were to run for president, how should he do it? As an unconventional politician, he’s quick with
a quip—and a barb—and isn’t exactly Hollywood glitterati.
Ice Miller attorney, lobbyist and long-time Republican fundraiser John Hammond thinks Daniels would need to run an unusual
campaign that fits his style and also would get him noticed in what looks to be a crowded field.
Hammond, who thinks the odds of the governor running are better than 50-50, says Daniels should stay away from big gatherings
like tea party conventions. He also shouldn’t start out traveling to Iowa and New Hampshire.
“I would avoid pure partisan activity at the moment,” he says. “It means you’re just like everyone
else, competing in the same space. You need to distinguish yourself.”
Daniels should lay a foundation by talking to lots of opinion-shapers in quarters as diverse as education, media and infrastructure,
Hammond continues. Explain to them how he’d handle the debt and trade deficit, how he’d fight terrorists.
Only after building deep grassroots support with influential people should Daniels trek to the early states and build recognition
with voters; at this point Daniels would bet on the grassroots people showing up and talking up his candidacy.
What about running in an era when television is the only exposure to candidates most voters get? Hammond thinks voters will
crave a candidate who, in his opinion, is more substance than glitz.
“The electorate is pretty intelligent. They make the right choices for the country. You gotta count on that,”
Hammond says. “They’ll be searching for someone who can solve some of the biggest issues, and some of their fears.”
That’s Hammond’s take; what’s yours?
Should Daniels opt in?








Three Magi
Cats out of the bag. The object of the game is to get acquired. That means the company has no idea how to grow beyond a certain point. Email is a 1990s technology. I have laughed at this company since day one. Such a small bit player. If it was anywhere but here, it wouldn't be newsworthy.
Esther, Indy has passed Chicago in the local government corruption arena. Don't downgrade us. We're No. 1 in the Midwest.
Does the buyer get to keep the recent Accu-Chek J.D. Power award? Be careful, those Swiss cannot be trusted. Last June they pimped Mayor Ballard and former Governor Daniels at a media op, announcing plans to invest "$300 million at its Indianapolis headquarters, creating up to 100 new jobs by 2017," only to turn around and close the Roche Nutley, NJ facility and eliminate 1000 jobs there later the same week. It seems that healthcare can be innovated only as long as money is to be made. Right now Roche seems to have big eyes for China: there are many Chinese in China and potential billions in Swiss francs! Since Roche is having difficulty with US insurance companies swallowing the bill for overpriced cancer drugs (with debatable efficacy) why not sell insurance to the Chinese and market the drugs to them there? There is a name for these sort of business practices however proper decorum precludes it use in this forum.
Same kind of Luddites who oppose I-69. Guessing their 501(c)(4) application probably sailed right through the IRS.