Local government reform still sputtering

March 4, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Today is expected to be the final day of the second General Assembly since the Kernan-Shepard report on local government reform was issued, and precious little has been accomplished.

Co-chaired by former Gov. Joe Kernan and Chief Justice Randall Shepard, the report included 27 recommendations to streamline local government with a subtitle, “We’ve got to stop governing like this.”

So far, we’re still governing this way, namely, inefficiently. And a couple of bills that would move township duties to county levels are thought to have slim odds of passage this session.

As an overview of just how little of Kernan-Shepard has been implemented, below is a list of the recommendations, and what has and has not passed. A number of bills have been introduced but quickly lost steam.

What are your thoughts about Kernan-Shepard? Do you anticipate more of the recommendations passing, or is it losing momentum?

County level

Assessing duties in all but 13 townships in the state have been shifted to county levels. Emergency public-safety dispatch must be consolidated before 2015. And child welfare funding has been moved from counties to the state.

—Establish a single-person county chief executive.
—Establish a single, unified legislative body for county government.
—Transfer duties of the auditor, treasurer, recorder, assessor, surveyor and sheriff to the county executive. Transfer duties of the clerk of the courts to the county election board and county executive.
—Create a countywide body to oversee public safety.
—Shift funding of the state’s trial courts, including public defenders and probation, to the state.


—Shift township duties of poor relief, fire protection, emergency medical services, and cemeteries to the county executive. Establish a countywide poor-relief levy.
—Transfer township small claims court in Marion County to superior courts.


Local referendums now must pass for elementary schools costing more than $10 million and high schools costing more than $20 million. However, a related part of the Kernan-Shepard recommendation is still stuck in the Statehouse: School corporation bonds being approved by the municipal or county government with the greatest proportion of assessed value in the school district.

—Reorganize school districts so each has a minimum of 2,000 students. Establish state standards and county-based planning.
—Prompt joint purchasing by schools.
—Conduct all nonpartisan school elections during November in even years.

Cities and towns

—All city councils to appoint city clerks in second-class cities.
—Move all municipal elections to an even-year cycle.
—Transfer responsibilities of municipal health departments to county health departments.

Libraries and special districts

Budgets and levies of all unelected boards must be approved by municipalities if the district is within the city or town.

—Reorganize library systems by county and provide permanent library services for all citizens.
—Strengthen current joint-purchasing infrastructure for libraries.

All local governments

—Expand voluntary coordination and consolidation of units and services. Strengthen powers of voters to compel consolidation.
—Allow local governments to establish service districts with differentiated levels of service and corresponding tax rates.
—Facilitate local improvement efforts using best management and business practices. Strengthen state mechanisms that support these activities, particularly for collective purchasing.
—Prohibit local government employees from serving as elected officials of the same government unit.

Support and monitoring

—Assign the Indiana Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations to monitor progress toward these recommendations and conduct annual research as needed. Produce an annual report through 2011.
—Establish a statewide benchmarking system to provide the public and policymakers current information about local government productivity and progress.
—Designate a state office to provide technical assistance to local government.


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. OK Larry, let's sign Lance, shore up the PG and let's get to the finals.

  2. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  3. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  4. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  5. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!