Local government reform still sputtering

March 4, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Today is expected to be the final day of the second General Assembly since the Kernan-Shepard report on local government reform was issued, and precious little has been accomplished.

Co-chaired by former Gov. Joe Kernan and Chief Justice Randall Shepard, the report included 27 recommendations to streamline local government with a subtitle, “We’ve got to stop governing like this.”

So far, we’re still governing this way, namely, inefficiently. And a couple of bills that would move township duties to county levels are thought to have slim odds of passage this session.

As an overview of just how little of Kernan-Shepard has been implemented, below is a list of the recommendations, and what has and has not passed. A number of bills have been introduced but quickly lost steam.

What are your thoughts about Kernan-Shepard? Do you anticipate more of the recommendations passing, or is it losing momentum?

County level

Assessing duties in all but 13 townships in the state have been shifted to county levels. Emergency public-safety dispatch must be consolidated before 2015. And child welfare funding has been moved from counties to the state.

—Establish a single-person county chief executive.
—Establish a single, unified legislative body for county government.
—Transfer duties of the auditor, treasurer, recorder, assessor, surveyor and sheriff to the county executive. Transfer duties of the clerk of the courts to the county election board and county executive.
—Create a countywide body to oversee public safety.
—Shift funding of the state’s trial courts, including public defenders and probation, to the state.


—Shift township duties of poor relief, fire protection, emergency medical services, and cemeteries to the county executive. Establish a countywide poor-relief levy.
—Transfer township small claims court in Marion County to superior courts.


Local referendums now must pass for elementary schools costing more than $10 million and high schools costing more than $20 million. However, a related part of the Kernan-Shepard recommendation is still stuck in the Statehouse: School corporation bonds being approved by the municipal or county government with the greatest proportion of assessed value in the school district.

—Reorganize school districts so each has a minimum of 2,000 students. Establish state standards and county-based planning.
—Prompt joint purchasing by schools.
—Conduct all nonpartisan school elections during November in even years.

Cities and towns

—All city councils to appoint city clerks in second-class cities.
—Move all municipal elections to an even-year cycle.
—Transfer responsibilities of municipal health departments to county health departments.

Libraries and special districts

Budgets and levies of all unelected boards must be approved by municipalities if the district is within the city or town.

—Reorganize library systems by county and provide permanent library services for all citizens.
—Strengthen current joint-purchasing infrastructure for libraries.

All local governments

—Expand voluntary coordination and consolidation of units and services. Strengthen powers of voters to compel consolidation.
—Allow local governments to establish service districts with differentiated levels of service and corresponding tax rates.
—Facilitate local improvement efforts using best management and business practices. Strengthen state mechanisms that support these activities, particularly for collective purchasing.
—Prohibit local government employees from serving as elected officials of the same government unit.

Support and monitoring

—Assign the Indiana Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations to monitor progress toward these recommendations and conduct annual research as needed. Produce an annual report through 2011.
—Establish a statewide benchmarking system to provide the public and policymakers current information about local government productivity and progress.
—Designate a state office to provide technical assistance to local government.


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.