Would health reform spark exodus of best, brightest?

March 15, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lots of angles of health care reform have been debated to death, but not this one: Guaranteed availability of insurance might be just what top employees in many  organizations are waiting for to bolt for the exits.

That’s the thinking of long-time human resources expert Karl Ahlrichs, who is writing a book about the topic. Ahlrichs recently joined Gregory & Appel Insurance as a benefits consultant.

Ahlrichs is hard-pressed to predict how many people would quit their jobs. Maybe just a relative few, maybe more.

But he thinks a number of baby boomers who currently are rejected for health insurance for various reasons would try something else if they could be assured of getting coverage—even if it cost upward of $10,000 per person.

They might start a business or take a couple of part-time jobs they enjoy. Perhaps they’d grab a part-time job and spend the balance of their time helping a favorite charity.

What most organizations don’t realize is, the best and brightest will take advantage of the opportunity first, Ahlrichs says. “The people who will leave are the good ones. The people who will stay are the mediocre ones.”

Ultimately, he adds, health reform might result in redistributing talent from poorly managed organizations to places that add more value to society.

What are your thoughts? Do you agree with Ahlrichs?

  • huh?
    Sounds like a lot of guessing to me; I'm not at all convinced; and it also sounds like a comment that an insurance broker, ala insurance company rep, would make!
  • interesting
    This is an interesting angle that I had not really considered before. There have been many times when I have talked to someone and or heard of someone staying in a job just because of the benefits. Universal health coverage could open a whole new avenue for many people who only stay for coverage. Also I myself avoid jobs with no health benefits, I imagine I would now consider them.
  • agree
    I know of several people who are afraid to leave because of insurance. I think the possibility of obtaining coverage outside the workplace would open up a lot of opportunities for people. Let's face it, by the time you are in your late 40's or 50's, nearly everyone has a 'prexisting' condition of some sort.
  • Nope
    Sounds like opponent to health care reform grabbing at straws...if it wasn't such a serious issue, I'd almost be amused!
  • Paul,
    I think this is actually an argument in favor of health care reform.
  • depends on ...
    depends on what is in the bill. If the bill has became a mandate for grabbing money out of our pockets without any benefits (like our current health care system), than it won't be any better. But if it provides a reasonable amount of coverage, it can spur one of two things. 1) Innovation like discussed in the above article. 2) a bunch of lazy people who won't get a job because they are going to live off the fat of the land (ie: like welfare before Clinton purposed a limit to the extent of how long welfare can be used). Or there can be a blend of the two. I just hope that IF we do implement a Health Care system for the general public, that the loop holes and pitfalls are filled in and we don't allow people to just take-take-take without giving back to the society as a whole.
  • Why just the brightest?
    I agree that national healthcare may open up a lot of opportunities for those who are tied to their current job due to health insurance, but not sure I agree it will affect only the top, brightest people. It sounds to me like the highest and lowest will benefit the most from healthcare reform, while everyone in the middle gets the finger - again!
  • The brightest won't buy health insurance
    The brightest will pay the $750 per year "penalty" rather than pay that per month for health insurance. This is just a ploy to get to single payer. As people catch on that they have nothing to lose by being uninsured they will drop coverage in mass. Premiums will skyrocket as the pool of insureds shrink away. The government will have to step in and insure us because we will not insure ourselves.
    I visualize insurance sign up desks at the ER or agents located next to main medical facilities. A insurance sign up person at the intake desk?
  • Your absolute fools...
    Every one of you that doubts this article is an absolute fool...I've been a healthcare professional for 17 years and I can PROMISE you many, many top healthcare professionals are making alternate plans for their profession. These people are perfectionists that will not be controlled and regulated by crappy government standards; the ones who won't tolerate taking sub-standard care of their patients are the exceptional ones, and they will be the first to go. Go ahead and act like you know it all - you know nothing unless you've been in the profession

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.