A tip for getting into vet school

March 31, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Want an edge to get into veterinary school? Tell the committee (hopefully with some honesty) that you want to work with large animals, particularly cattle, hogs and other future entrees. Your chances increase slightly because you’ll actually be considered a plus for diversity.

Large animals have lost their luster—to the point where some experts are becoming uneasy about the future safety of the national food supply.

Areas of Kansas, Nebraska and other outposts already are struggling with shortages of large-animal vets, says Dr. W. Mark Hilton, an associate professor in Purdue University’s veterinary school.

Hilton hasn’t heard of shortages in Indiana’s major food-producing regions—beef cattle in the south, and dairies and hogs in the north. But shortages are possible if trends continue at Purdue and other schools.

“Do you want a safe food supply?” Hilton asks. “If we don’t have people who are as trained in large-animal, that makes it much worse.”

A couple of decades ago, the vast majority of vet students wanted to work with large animals. Not anymore. Now, most want to work with dogs, cats and other small creatures.

Only about 20 percent of the 72 incoming vet students at Purdue are moving toward large-animal practices. Hilton thinks the pipeline would be adequate if the number were closer to 30 percent.

Many of the Millennials coming into vet schools would rather push buttons of high-tech equipment than slog through mud and manure on farms, endure extreme seasonal heat and cold, and dodge flying hoofs.

Those all come with the territory, Hilton acknowledges. (It’s easier to “read” whether a cow will kick, Hilton advises, but horses are unpredictable.)

However, he says the perception that small-animal vets make more money isn’t necessarily true. Studies have shown their incomes to be roughly equivalent. Purdue grads started out at an average of $64,000 last year, and the number usually marches to about $80,000 within five years. Farms will spend money on veterinarians if vets in effect become consultants who tell them how to avoid medical expenses, Hilton says.

Purdue is getting so many prospects wanting to move into small-animal practices that the school now looks harder for large-animal prospects if for no other reason than to avoid homogenous classes, he says. If you’re in a tight contest with a small-animal aspirant and you like large animals? You’re probably in.

What do you think? For someone teetering on the edge of getting into vet school, would it be worth going with large animals?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • I don't believe this is true
    As a person that has tried to become part of Purdue's Veterinary class in the past I had made it very apparent that I wanted to practice large animal medicine. This is a fact and I put it on my application because it was the truth. Unfortunatly, even with a decent GPA that was very competetive I wasn't awarded the opportunity. I believe that Purdue does still take a majority of small animal tracked students even though there is a majority that want to still practice large. Did I eventually get into vet school? Yes. I am very happy with the choice I made to study abroad at St. Matthew's University in Grand Cayman. Even being a first semester student I am getting a large amount of clinical and animal husbandry experience both large and small. The small class sizes are advantageous because everyone gets to participate. Would I have liked to stay in Indiana? Yes. I am glad that I came here and wouldn't trade it for anything in the world. Yes, I will have to take additional boards unless IN decides to accept PAVE which they should follow suit with some of our fellow states because we still participate in a year of clinicals in the US at an AVMA accredited veterinary school after our basic science classes are completed. To the people who still really want to be veterinarians, don't give up hope just because you don't get into one school. If there is a will there is a way!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT