Trouble in life-sciences paradise

April 12, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Think of life sciences centers in Indiana, and Bloomington is often mentioned in the same breath as Indianapolis, West Lafayette and Warsaw.

But Bloomington is struggling to keep its edge, suggests a package of stories that ran over the weekend in The Herald-Times. A link is here (subscription is required).

Bloomington has too few workers qualified to work at places like Cook Group, Boston Scientific and Baxter Healthcare, the newspaper reported. And Bill Cook, a pioneering entrepreneur in the sector, chided the city for a lack of serious innovation.

“We have been talking ‘high-tech’ in this community for 30 years,” Cook is quoted as saying. “Not much has come of it. There is a lot of talk. I am not sure there are a whole lot of ideas.”

This is strong language from a billionaire whose sprawling company virtually single-handedly launched the industry in Bloomington.

Four years ago, Cook Group planned to make a new product line in Bloomington but had to send the work elsewhere because it couldn’t find enough workers. If the problem wasn’t a criminal record, it was inadequate education or poor hand-eye coordination.

Today, life sciences accounts for 6.8 percent of local jobs in the Bloomington area. But hardly any innovations are coming out of Bloomington, Cook chided; nearly all of interest to Cook Group are discovered in West Lafayette, Indianapolis or elsewhere.

Life sciences is supposed to be one of the bright spots in Bloomington to replace jobs like those lost at Thomson Consumer Electronics’ television assembly plant and General Electric’s refrigerator plant. Also keep in mind that Bloomington is supposed to be one of those places state economic development experts don’t need to worry about. In addition to the stability of employment at Indiana University, life sciences is supposed to bulk up advanced manufacturing employment and, at least to some extent, create highly paid research positions.

How do you feel about life sciences in Bloomington? Across the state?

  • The Emporer Has No Clothes!!!
    The biggest reason that our State has been so far behind in the biotech/pharma/medical device arena is because we have one just one medical school. Even Kentucky has 2 medical schools. Our one medical school cannot even compete with the top tier medical institutions across the country. We, as a State, cannot even provide the infrastructure to conduct the clinical trials for new drugs/medical devices for new companies in our State or other companies in general. Our State desperately needs several research medical schools to bring our State up to par with our immediate neighbor states before we can even consider competing with other areas of the country. We have been naked for years and have been too blind to notice!!!
  • Perceptions of trouble
    It's marvelous how an innocuous article in a third-rate newspaper is blown into introspection on the viability of life science efforts in the state. Bill Cook is looking for people with good hand-eye coordination, and somehow that's linked to bulking up on advanced manufacturing employment? I guess these days an IU two-year Biotechnology degree give one the opportunity leverage their good hand-eye coordination. Now others take this message as the need for more medical schools and the State to provide more infrastructures for clinical trials. Why must the State provide these funds? Over the past decade, too many State funds have been thrown at universities to improve life science infrastructure with a questionable ROI. (Just look at the 21st Century Fund results.) Want to do clinicals, pull a Lilly and outsource it. That's why CROs are proliferating, even for Phase 1 clinicals. Cook says hardly any innovations are coming out of Bloomington, but can be found in other parts of the State. The lack of innovation permeates a lot of activities in Bloomington. There are a few bright spots, but maybe the lack of innovation is due to the lack of vision or leadership in the area? Could be that floating in the bureaucracy of the risk averse academic environment is a belief that more State-funded infrastructure will magically produce scientific breakthroughs? Or, could it be that value-focused leadership, willing to take risks, seeking funds from alternative sources, and not afraid to upset the status-quo in a stodgy institution, is what is required to spark innovation in Bloomington. I'll believe the latter, but the person will probably need to be recruited from outside of Indiana.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.