Our Internet service is bad—really bad, according to two researchers at the New America Foundation, a think tank chaired
by Google CEO Eric Schmidt.
Writing in Slate.com,
Sascha Meinrath and James Losey assert that we Americans spend a lot and get precious little for the dollar.
We pay an average of $35 per month for a connection with only 1 megabit per second. Denmark and Canada, for example, pay
less for twice the speed.
Speeds here also are sluggish. Americans pay $145 a month for top residential speeds of 50 Mbps. Several top countries have
speeds four times faster at less than $60 a month.
Feeling good yet? Add this to the lament: Other countries have adopted broadband on a larger scale.
American broadband execs boast of some of the highest penetration rates in the world. But Meinrath and Losey note that the
execs avoid mentioning adoption rates. The reality is that lots of Americans have access to broadband but relatively few actually
use it, probably because of the high cost.
The authors go so far as to call Verizon CEO Ivan Seiderberg and his peers hucksters for spending tens of millions of dollars
on lobbying to confuse the issue with “bogus” information.
Why the mess? Too little competition, and confusing information that makes comparison shopping difficult, Meinrath and Losey
contend.
Unless the Federal Communications Commission dictates that all Internet service providers offer a “broadband nutrition
label” to ease decision-making, collect better information on available services, and usher serious competition into
the industry, the researchers say “the United States could end up on the wrong side of the international digital divide.”
What are your thoughts? Do Meinrath and Losey overstate the situation, or are they being too nice? And how do you like Comcast,
BrightHouse, AT&T or other ISPs in the Indianapolis area? Are you happy with your service?








IBJ Conversations
11 Comments
Add Comment
I would also add to this cellular phone service in the U.S., which is woefully behind much of Europe (signal coverage, phone interoperability, etc.).
We pay too much for too little.
Internet now has tiered pricing based upon download speeds, yet few actually receive the tiered speeds advertised.
There is little true competition between carriers in several telecom categories and no regulatory oversight or enforcement of anti competitive practices, anti-trust, or truth in advertising laws in our state.
There is no incentive to provide quality and quanity at competitive rates. Unlimited "Voice-only" wireless could / should run about $10 a month, Broadband about $20 and unlimited Voice / Text / Data on wireless 3G about $40 but corporate greed is getting in the way.
If everybody in the state pays at least $30/mo for internet, lets let Mitch Daniels do what he did with the BMV and just make it ubiquitous across the state.
Everybody can pay an additional $30 in taxes and get free Wifi everywhere. Pay an extra $50 and you can get ultra high speed.
If you don't like the idea, have you been to the BMV lately? I was impressed.
State leaders are beholden to the telecom lobby and their political donations:
Indiana has lost thousands of telecom jobs, yet through complicit fraud or ignorance they publicly state we have gained telecom jobs
Company and public records reflect that Indiana consumers have reduced the adoption of Internet and other telecom services, yet public officials and company PR machines tell us the opposite.
Governor appointments to the Indiana Utility Consumer Counselor have intentionally been useless and ineffective advocates for ratepayers, as his Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission appointments fail to implement any change that results in a more competitive environment that expands affordable telecom services.
Indiana's leadership through incompetence or lack of desire have not been effective in winning billions in Federal High Speed Broadband, Smart Grid and Telemedicine grants compared to other states.
Our leaders have failed us.
I'd rather have a HUGE file use to measure it. Let the user know it's going to take at least amount of time, depending upon the file used. I'd rather wait to get an accurate measurement.
One of the things a lot of people don't realize about cable is the maximum throughput is capped. Not for you, but for anyone else on the same "trunk".
You can crack the cap, but it's not legal.
I'm working on something and if I bring it into the house, I'll leave our personal connection on cable, but run the u-Verse connection for work. It'll make it easy to separate the cost for each type of activity.
What I'm surprised at is the issue of broadband over power lines being dropped.
IIRC, there was a good field test in Cincinnati. The original work was done with a farmer who had a tidy network set up on his farm.
Equipment (small & simple) exists so you can do it within your house.
Where's the rest of it (outside of houses)?