No executive wants the government telling them what to do. But a new analysis of the crash of Irwin Financial Corp. in Columbus makes one
question what was going through the head of Chairman Will Miller before the institution last fall became Indiana’s first
and only bank to be liquidated during this banking crisis.
The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago several times in the past decade warned the Columbus bank’s directors and executives
that their expertise and controls lagged behind the institution’s explosive growth into commercial lending and home
mortgages.
In fact, the Fed’s Office of Inspector General says in the report, warning lights were blinking so brightly that the
Chicago Fed should have cracked down. Perhaps the bank could have been saved, the report reasons.
Indeed, the report cites several instances in which warnings apparently were shrugged off.
Here’s how bad things got: Irwin’s assets nearly tripled in the five years ended in 2008, but the bank’s
net income actually fell. And the consumer lending business developed a loan program that didn’t require borrowers to
verify their incomes.
For other articles on the report and Irwin's downfall, click here.
So, the Fed is kicking itself for not cracking down on Irwin. But what about Miller, the scion of philanthropist and industrialist
J. Irwin Miller, who built Cummins into a powerhouse and kept the bank humming all those years? As the fifth generation to
run the bank, what was he thinking?
And what about the directors, who in addition to Miller included Dave Goodrich, the former president of Central Indiana Corporate
Partnership and former chief of what is now the commercial real estate powerhouse Cassidy Turley; Dayton Molendorp, CEO of
One America, the Indianapolis-based insurer; R. David Hoover, Chairman of Ball Corp., the glass jar and aerospace company
headquartered in Muncie before it was moved to Colorado.
These are gold-plated names. Yet, the report paints them as something otherwise.
What are you thinking?








IBJ Conversations
2 Comments
Add Comment
And you're right, Norm, where and what is the culpability of the former directors? They didn't seem to mind taking their director's pay. Were they motivated by greed as well? Or did they just want to compete with the big boys so badly that they couldn't see the train wreck waiting to happen? Makes you wonder how sharp or how involved they really were.
It is truly a sad state of affairs. And do I want to move my money to AUL? Me thinks perhaps not.