Gee, thanks for hitting us in the pocketbook. Would you please stick to your knitting? That in effect is the message of a
new statement from the Greater Bloomington Chamber of Commerce regarding the city’s boycott of Arizona announced earlier
this month.
The action taken by the city’s elected officials against Arizona’s new illegal immigration statute has prompted
more than 40 complaints to the chamber, mostly threats to boycott Bloomington unless the Arizona boycott is lifted, the chamber
says. At a chamber the size of Bloomington's, that’s a crisis. Chamber members say they’re getting similar
threats from suppliers and customers.
Chamber President Christy Gillenwater says it’s unclear how serious the threats are. Only time will tell if someone
really does avoid a restaurant after a football game this fall.
Next time, she says, elected officials should think a little more about how their actions affect local business. Especially
when the economy is rocky.
“The comments we received are very serious in tone,” Gillenwater says, adding, “We have challenges of our
own, definitely enough to keep us busy in Bloomington and Monroe County.”
Reader comments to news articles and blog posts about the boycott run overwhelmingly negative against Bloomington.
But the city’s decision raises pesky questions about the purpose of local government: Just what should mayors and city
councils provide beyond basic police and fire protection?
If at one end of the spectrum the task stops at keeping residents safe, then Bloomington officials went way, way over the
top by not only commenting on another state’s law but actually fighting it.
At the other extreme, if officials, as extensions of the citizens who elected them, are obligated to take stands on social
issues far and wide, then Bloomington might have done the right thing. (The same point could be argued on behalf of officials
who, for example, would boycott a state for allowing gay marriage.)
Where do you come down? Are the Bloomington officials out of line? And what are your broader feelings about boycotts? Do
they work?








IBJ Conversations
28 Comments
Add Comment
No more Oliver Wine for me. I would just as soon buy from Brown County or Easley.
You would think the loons would have enough sense to see where this could lead, but no.......
Hats off to the chamber of commerce for standing up for what is sensible!
I will direct my employees to do likewise. No meals, no wine from Oliver's, no hotels, no gas, no purchases of any kind with any business in Bloomington.
I will support in every way an Indiana State law that does the same thing as the Arizona law.
My company probably only spends about $3,500.00 each year in Bloomington. A drop in the bucket. My family probably spends another $1,500.00 at IU ballgames, restaurants and Olivers each year.
But our "drops" will add up!
Not one more penny in Bloomington until they stop this non-sense!
Now the Indiana Republicans are getting fussy at their computers, making threat posts about how they will cease their visits to Bloomington. (Guys, we don't really believe most of you ever came in the first place). Stay in Greenwood and Castleton and Avon. Go to Applebees and shop at Walmart. Visit Scottsdale (by the way, have you been to Arizona? Scottsdale is probably the 100th coolest place there...)
Bloomington is doing well in this recession, with unemployment rates almost 4 points lower than the state average. We can keep Kirkwood and the rest of the city going without you and, to be frank, most of us won't miss seeing you downtown ;)
http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=usunemployment&ctype=l&strail=false&nselm=h&met_y=unemployment_rate&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=state&idim=state:ST180000&idim=county:CN181050&tdim=true&tstart=631152000000&tunit=M&tlen=243&hl=en&dl=en
"Area Racists Vow to Stay Out of Bloomingotn"
I'm only sorry we didn't try this years ago.
You say the majority of Bloomingtonites think the AZ law is ethically wrong. Funny, that it was patterned after the federal law already on the books but uninforced. Since when is being or enforcing "legal" unethical?
Something you should know, this isn't a Republican thing. Parties don't count anymore because they have failed the people.
So, stay in your little town with its nose up in the air. Enjoy life with the loons. As for the rest of us, we've had enough and we aren't buying or going.
Would you not have proper identification on your person if you were traveling abroad?..most nations require that at a minimum. Yet we want to say that requirement is not fair here? Just so we have a block of voters that can be mobilized at election time?..the depths to which politicians and parties in this country sink is disgraceful.
Having said that, I doubt there is a whole lot of teeth in the Bloomington boycott...it will probably affect them worse than it does Arizona...and I doubt that many people will boycott Bloomington either...to the extent that they do, I guess that is on the political leaders there...you reap what you sow. It is a free country...I have no problem with the statement they made if they felt it was that important, even though I personally think it is uninformed.
Your name is funny.
Scott