How federal pork suppresses business

June 15, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An old axiom in Indiana is that the state suffers because Hoosier politicians bring home too little pork from Washington. If officials like Richard Lugar and Evan Bayh would just return more of those tax dollars, goes the wistful thinking, Indiana would have better roads to support business and better public spaces to attract knowledge workers.

However, a new Harvard Business School study suggests the truth is just the opposite: Federal money actually suppresses business investment and growth. In other words, be thankful that the dollars are not flowing to Indiana, at least not in massive quantities.

The researchers found a strong link between politicians’ rise to powerful congressional committee chairmanships—perches from which they could direct pork homeward—and a falloff in business investment.

A year after assuming a chairmanship, the chairman’s state on average received at least 40 percent more federal earmark spending, a level that endures until they leave the post.

In the year following the ascendancy, public companies in the politician’s home state cut capital expenditures about 15 percent, curtail research and development spending, and increase their dividends to investors. Companies also winnow headcount and see sales growth fall off.

The results held fairly consistently across large and small companies, and large and small states.

Indiana certainly sends more tax dollars to Washington than it gets back. The state, 14th-largest by population, ranks 32nd in earmarks. Only California, New York, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan and North Carolina get fewer earmarks on a per-capita basis.

A link to the study, which is quite readable, is here.

Why does federal largess suffocate corporate creativity? Purdue University finance professor John McConnell thinks local people put more energy into trying to land pork than doing productive work and creating jobs.

Look at West Virginia, McConnell says. It’s full of federally funded projects courtesy of long-time Sen. Robert Byrd, yet it’s among the most economically depressed states in the nation.

“Like many other opiates, federal pork creates an addiction that stunts creativity,” he says. “In this case, the addiction crowds out entrepreneurial activity of the type that creates value.”

McConnell adds that everyone would be better off with lower taxes and not having to beg to get it back.

Your turn. Is there an upside to pork?

  • extend concept to foreign aid
    I expect that similar research would show aid in 3rd world countries suppresses business and innovation there as wellâ?¦ Thus prolonging the inability of them to become self sufficient.
  • Amen to this study!
    Coming out of Harvard, an elite east coast school, it can't be seen as "right wing propoganda", but what a great study to have a dialogue about in the public forum.

    People are fed up with the pork process. In the West Virginia example, Roberty Byrd has seniority because he's been there for 50 years but he can barely walk and talk now in his 90s. Can anyone of either party think that is an ideal example of a highly engaged Senator or representative of the people?

    Entitlements and Pork: two types of government spending that by their name alone sound like the opposite of self-reliance, hard work and creativity.

    People are rightfully concerned about public spending, govt employee pensions, and debt levels.

    I hope this study will remain in the public debate.
  • Now what
    McConnell's last quote in the article sums up the sentiment of most taxpayers: "...everyone would be better off with lower taxes and not having to beg to get it back." The problem is that over 40% of the voters don't pay taxes, but still receive the benefits of pork spending or subsidies of various kinds. Therefore, even with this study or 1,000 like it our politicians will still reach for the earmarks and brag about what they get rather than vote for tax cuts so that they can keep getting the mass non-tax payer votes versus votes from the ever decreasing number of people who actually create wealth, create jobs, pay most of the taxes......
  • Pork
    Excellent words, Steve! A simple solution - cut spending accross the board by 20% and let the chips fall where they may. The ones that scream the loudest will be the voices for the "entitled". People like Jesse Jackson come to mind. Then the liberal lie fest about how this will kill old people, babies, and keep the poor from being educated. Where will it ever end?.....
  • but how....
    how is this federal pork spent? Who is it going to? How are these people spending the money received? From there, where does the money go?

    Basically, What is the road map of the Federal Pork? Is it directly to project which they give it right back and no one else benefits? Does it go to supplies, Products, and labor? What is the fiscal Trickle Down effect of the Federal Pork spending?
  • cuts
    Couldn't agree more Berwick Guy. Reference this article from Indy Star for proof:
    or how about this one:
    The fact of the matter is that it's much easier to squawk than it is to give up something that you've gotten for free for an extended period of time.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1