ArcelorMittal throws down gauntlet on gun law

July 1, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The first round in a likely legal shootout over Indiana’s new guns-at-work law was fired this week by ArcelorMittal, the Luxembourg–based steelmaking giant that operates mills in northwest Indiana.

Workers cannot bring guns to work despite the new law, which took effect July 1, the company warned in a letter to its employees, and any worker who brings a gun to work could be fired.

ArcelorMittal said federal law trumps state law, but in a statement to The Times of Munster, a company spokeswoman didn’t specify which law. However, ArcelorMittal might fall under an exemption granted under a maritime security law.

The law, which sailed through the General Assembly, allows leaving guns and ammunition in locked vehicles out of plain sight.

It’s hard not to imagine this conflict tumbling into the courts. Indiana Chamber of Commerce President Kevin Brinegar said several companies are considering challenging the statute. Read IBJ's story here.

Ice Miller labor attorney Paul Sinclair suspects a couple of years or more will pass before property-rights complaints from businesses reach an equilibrium with those of gun owners.

Lawsuits, or even complaints that could lead to suits, might be taken up the Legislature, Sinclair says. Or a court decision could force the General Assembly to tweak the statute. If an ArcelorMittal worker sues, a court decision would be anticipated within about 18 months, he predicts.

“It’s hard to tell,” he says. “The arguments haven’t had the opportunity to be filtered through, which ones make sense and which ones don’t.”

Ultimately, Sinclair adds, companies will want to know what they’re obligated to do to protect employees while meeting the law. They’ll also want to know why some types of businesses fall under the statute and others, such as day cares, do not.

As an aside, Indiana actually isn’t a huge gun state, if an assessment by The Daily Beast online site is any indication. The Hoosier state ranked 27th last year based on FBI background checks on gun purchases. There were 11,614 checks per 100,000 population.

That was nothing compared to top-ranked Kentucky’s 134,028 checks and even No. 2 Utah‘s 30,315. A caution The Daily Beast acknowledges: Not all states report the data consistently. Kentucky, for instance, does some checks on a monthly basis. So make your own guesses on the actual rate of gun ownership.

Any thoughts about guns and work?

  • Questions
    I have a few questions about the law allowing employees to brings guns into a workplace (although locked in vehicles out of plain sight).

    1. Are employers at extra risk from civil lawsuits should an employee fire a gun at the workplace? Or does the statute alleviate some safety responsibility, if only slightly?

    2. Are employers' insurance rates rising because of the new law?

    3. Can employers require workers to report whether they are bringing guns onto the premises?

    4. Can employees' guns be stored on a motorcycle? Bicycle? Evidently, if an employee walks to work, the law doesn't apply.
  • bikes
    can my job make me give them a copy of my gun permit and make a copy to carry my gun to work under new law and put a sticker on my car saying i have a gun and park away from every body
  • They are already there
    The guns are at work now, you would be surprised to know how many people take guns to work now.The ones you need to worry about are the ones that are there illegally.The law doesn't address those, only the ones the law abiding citizens bring to work

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...