An ode to utility workers

July 13, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

What is it about people who work for utilities? A new Indiana University study shows they stick with their jobs more than employees in any other industry—just the opposite of temp workers.

More than 65 percent of state utility workers have stayed in the sector, and nearly 60 percent with the same employer, for more than six years, according to a study by Indiana Business Research Center in the Kelley School of Business.

Manufacturing is next in line in job tenure, but the sector is stable partly because layoffs favor those with seniority.

Bill Beck, who worked in corporate relations for a Minnesota power utility before starting another career writing corporate histories—many of them about utilities—says utility workers are a different breed.

The industry is about as close as one can get to government and still be in the private sector, notes Beck, whose Lakeside Writers' Group now operates out of Indianapolis. That’s not to denigrate utility workers, as in “good enough for government work.” Beck’s point is that the industry is highly regulated, which means i’s must be dotted and t’s crossed by careful engineers and financial people.

Utility workers, from the professionals to the electric linemen who enjoy a kind of esprit dé corps for their keeping the juice flowing, make good money. They also draw contentment from knowing they do important work.

“It’s one of those jobs where you can go home at night and you can feel like I contributed something today,” Beck says. “I mean, how many people can say that anymore?

“It seems to attract people who are very stable. They just hang around a lot.”

What are your thoughts about utility employees?


 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Utility Workers
    My cousin Cheryl just retired vrom Rush Shelby Energy after 37 years in their office. They asked her what she wanted to do on her last day. Then they took her to the parking lot and put her up in a 50-ft. bucket truck. Gotta love the ride.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT