Reports filtering out of other states have people with underwater mortgages handing the keys back to the bank. These aren’t
folks who lost jobs or their health and can no longer make the payments; they can afford the payments.
Rather, they’ve decided the values of their houses have fallen so far that it no longer makes economic sense to keep
paying off the mortgage. So they’re walking away.
The so-called strategic defaults are most common in markets where the housing boom was hottest—California, Florida,
Nevada—although the once-unheard of phenomena is emerging in other places, too.
Jim Litten, president of F.C. Tucker Co., one of Indiana’s largest residential real estate brokerages, has yet to hear
of a strategic default in the Indianapolis area, but he doubts it would become a big trend here. House values didn’t
boom and then bust here to the extent they did in the most overheated markets. So there’s less economic incentive to
look beyond ruining a credit score and quit.
Asked what he thinks of the trend, he laughs ruefully. People wouldn’t pull stunts like this on a stockbroker if a
stock went south, he says, so why should they do it to a lender? After all, the homeowners signed a paper saying they would
pay back the loan.
“There’s been a shift in values,” Litten says. “If they have the ability to pay, I don’t think
that’s the right way out.”
What are your thoughts?








IBJ Conversations
7 Comments
Add Comment
And now someone actually thinks that a private individual who made a promise to pay back a loan on a house, in which the house (and only the house) was offered as security against the loan, should continue to pay based on absolutely no legal obligation but only on some banker's sense of moral equity???
If governments get to ignore written laws that specifically require explicit actions, how on earth do you justify compelling a homeowner, lucky enough to still be employed, to pay his or her loan on a house that the same government and beaurocrats have caused to be devalued to a fraction of the loan value?
If government and big bailed-out banks want to express some moral outrage, they ought to try demonstrating that they have the faintest inkling of what a moral is or that they would even recognize one.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.