Small banks botched public relations, outsider charges

July 23, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Bank reform is now law, and regulators soon will begin drawing up new rules for banks to live by.

Mark Hill, a local entrepreneur with close ties to banking, thinks small- and medium-size banks are going to regret not having lobbied harder to knock some of the sharp edges off the legislation.

Hill has an unusual perspective on the industry. He made a lot of money selling software to mid-sized banks through the firm he started, Baker Hill, and then made another killing when he sold Baker Hill to Experian in 2005.

The new regulations will be overwrought, thus expensive for banks, fears Hill, now an angel investor in tech startups. And he believes the banks have nobody to blame but themselves.

In the months leading up to the debate over reform, small- and medium-sized banks did a rotten job of telling their story, he says. The public needed to be reminded that banks play a crucial role in the economy by accepting savings, loaning out the money and making a return for the depositor. Depositors also needed to be told that businesses and jobs depend on profitable banks.

The banks should have screamed in the public square that, while admitting they also got caught up in mortgage speculation and other excesses pioneered by the huge Wall Street institutions, instead, they were not Wall Street; they mostly helped Main Street prosper.

Hill can’t recall receiving so much as a piece of direct mail from his own bank explaining banks’ role in the economy and larger society.

“It feels like they ought to be starting with their own customers,” he says. “I think a lot of people think the bank is the big, bad guy who won’t lend them money. They’ve just not done a good job of differentiating themselves in the mind’s eye of the public.”

do you agree? Did the smaller banks botch public relations?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • What reform?
    You think banking reform was heavy-handed? Seriously? Did it curtail the casino-style betting of derivatives that got us in this mess? No. Did it force banks to separate the depositors money from their own when they make those wild gambles (Volker rule)? No. If anything this new legislation is weak sauce. Does Mark Hill remember why bank reform became an issue in the first place? I do agree with him on one thing: the banks have nobody to blame but themselves. Too bad he thinks it's related to PR.
  • What
    You know who cried most about regulations in the early Bush administration? The very people who got the deregulations and caused the financial crisis. I choose to bank at small local banks and not the megabanks (although it is getting harder to do) for this very reason. Do you think for a moment that the megabanks really care about me, my community, the welfare of my society when they reside elsewhere? You bet they don't. They only look after themselves at the price of all us other guys. Case in point, the financial crisis we are now in.
  • What
    You know who cried most about regulations in the early Bush administration? The very people who got the deregulations and caused the financial crisis. I choose to bank at small local banks and not the megabanks (although it is getting harder to do) for this very reason. Do you think for a moment that the megabanks really care about me, my community, the welfare of my society when they reside elsewhere? You bet they don't. They only look after themselves at the price of all us other guys. Case in point, the financial crisis we are now in.
  • Not so fast
    Jim, fair enough, but you're naive if don't think that small banks care about their bottom line first and foremost. And look at the list of 96 banks the FDIC has shut down this year. Mostly small, community banks. The dirty secret out there that no one wants to seem to talk about is that a lot of small banks made bad commercial real estate bets, and we're starting to see the results of that. So, don't be so quick to sing the small bank praises.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT