Notaries headed toward endangered list

July 30, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In the not-so-distant past, the stamp of the notary public was all but ubiquitous on important documents. But notaries are vanishing faster than an endangered species.

In 2007, the Indiana Secretary of State’s Office logged 22,840 expirations but only 17,636 renewals or new notaries—a 22-percent decline.

The nosedive accelerated to 30 percent last year, and so far this year it’s running at 41 percent.

Jerry Bonnett, chief legal counsel at the office, says the type of authentification notaries do is falling out of fashion. Many companies now accept photo ID or confirm over the telephone or Internet.

“Notary publics were more popular in the days when companies and people relied heavily on postal mail,” Bonnett says. He adds that there is no indication that constituents or businesses are having trouble finding notaries.

How do you feel? Is it too early to start feeling nostalgic?

  • Are difficult to find
    With certain government documents still requiring notorization, it's important that either government revises their requirements or that government offices provide a notary. I have had several frustrating days trying to seek out a notary public to sign and certify a document.
  • Whats the big deal?
    Never had a problem in the rare instance of needing a notary. My insurance agent and bank do it...
  • Notaries
    I recently had to get my father's signature on a financial document that had to be notarized. Fortunately there are still 2 notaries in his building. Look for the older girls if you need one.
  • Consider the market
    There was the promise of big money as a notary working with the ballooning real estate market from about 2003 to 2005. Since re-finances and purchases have fallen drastically, a lot of individuals who started only for the money are reconsidering this as work, and not renewing their commissions. As a notary myself, notaries are by no means endangered, just more diversified in the co-businesses they conduct along with their notary business and how they market themselves.
  • Electronic Notary
    One reason Indiana is seeing a decline, it's because it like many of the other states, it too has failed to join the electronic age. Thereby, forcing their notaries into extinction. I'm a commissioned notary, and my business is good. I get lots of requests because currently I am one of the few that does electronic notarizations in a state that allows them.

    It's time we all got on the electronic notary bandwagon, and made money in the process. I have used several different technologies including the MMA's version, but the one that I found to be the best is Their system is so easy to use, and everything that the MMA might have told you or promised they actually do. Very inexpensive too.
  • IN Notary Population is Stable
    Taken alone, the expirations-versus-new/renewing numbers paint a dire picture of notary population decline in Indiana. But an essential value was omitted from your calculations: the number of active notaries who, in the midst of their current eight-year commission terms, belonged in neither the "expirations" nor
    "new/renewing" categories.

    For example, the active notary population number at the beginning of 2007 was 124,053. Incorporating this starting point and recalculating the effect of commission expirations and new/renewing commissions issued in 2007, 2008 and 2009 produces a true read on year-end populations, and dramatically smaller population decline percentages for those same years: 4%, 10% and 6% respectively. (The Indiana Secretary of Stateâ??s Office advises that the current notary population is 100,141.)

    Such modest rates of population decline are easily explained by todayâ??s lean economy--a few more employers and individuals are electing to carve expenses such as the fees for a notary commission out of their budgets. More importantly, 2007â??s beginning notary population (124,053) was higher than the historical annual average of 100,000 due to prior statutory changes to notariesâ?? term of commission. Indianaâ??s four-year term was changed to ten years in 1998, then to eight years in 2000, resulting in staggered terms that influenced the ensuing yearsâ?? numbers for active notaries, expirations and new/renewing notaries.

    As for the ongoing value of notaries, one need only consider how extremely accessible they still are--just inquire at any bank, credit union or copy center, use an online locator tool, etc.--to conclude that demand for their services is intense. We also note that employee notaries, while fewer in number, are being better tended (valued) by their employers, who are implementing professional growth strategies such as internal notary education programs and access to professional associations such as ours for technical support and information.

    Far from "falling out of fashion," notaries public are and will remain in high demand and highly esteemed by all those who rely upon their services.

    Kathleen Butler
    Executive Director
    American Society of Notaries

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?