U.S. effectively bankrupt, economist says

August 12, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Laurence Kotlikoff, an opinionated Boston University economist with a history of criticizing fiscal policies of both Democrats and Republicans, has posted a chilling column on Bloomberg.com saying the United States is not hurtling toward bankruptcy, like some pessimists say, but already is effectively broke.

You heard that correct, we’re broke. Actually worse off than Greece, Kotlikoff says.

Kotlikoff reaches the conclusion by pointing to other authorities, namely the International Monetary Fund and the Congressional Budget Office.

Buried in an IMF document this summer was the assertion that in order for the U.S. to meet all of its financial obligations, including its debt payments, taxes must be doubled immediately and permanently on personal income, corporate, federal and payroll.

CBO data shows the U.S. is on the hook for $202 trillion, 15 times the official debt level. The figure is so much bigger than the one normally bandied about because it includes the burdens of such future benefits as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

The deluge of baby-boomer retirements is about to collapse the system, Kotlikoff warns. No longer will younger generations be able to support old folks.

“Uncle Sam’s Ponzi scheme will stop. But it will stop too late,” he said. “And it will stop in a very nasty manner.”

The upshot is that the U.S. faces huge benefit cuts just as boomers hit retirement, massive tax increases that would leave little incentive for young people to work and save, and the temptation to crank up the presses that print money.

“This is an awful, downhill road to follow, but it’s the one we are on,” Kotlikoff said. “And bond traders will kick us miles down our road once they wake up and realize the U.S. is in worse fiscal shape than Greece.”

What do you think? Is he a Chicken Little or sage prophet?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • What took them so long to figure that out?
    Any fool can understand that when you spend more than you take in that eventually you go bankrupt. Washington has been talking about green shoots and the summer of recovery-who are they kidding? Sadly, most Americans are more in tune with Snookie & Lindsey Lohan that our messed up and broken system. it will come crashing down soon enough.
  • Look Out !!!!!
    I just hope I can get into cash, before the latest stock market crash comes booming down on all of us. Ever watched "Life Without Humans" on cable. Get your survivle skills tuned, so you can get back to being a hunter-gatherer or a farmer.
  • Close, but not yet.
    I am not too sure I can agree with him entirely. Especially when he takes into consideration that the Social Security problem, though it is real and will be a burden for sure, has us in bankruptcy already. You can't take how much we have no and then compare it to what we owe now and in the next 30 years. If so, then taking on almost any significant debt would automatically put you in bankruptcy. There's a plethora of austerity measures the Central Bank and law-makers can use to finagle our way out of this. If not, buy some ink and teach congress how to spell "seigniorage!"
  • Close, but not yet.
    I am not too sure I can agree with him entirely. Especially when he takes into consideration that the Social Security problem, though it is real and will be a burden for sure, has us in bankruptcy already. You can't take how much we have no and then compare it to what we owe now and in the next 30 years. If so, then taking on almost any significant debt would automatically put you in bankruptcy. There's a plethora of austerity measures the Central Bank and law-makers can use to finagle our way out of this. If not, buy some ink and teach congress how to spell "seigniorage!"
  • Anonymous

    $202 trillion is the highest estimate I've seen, but even if it's ONLY $100 trillion or so makes no practical difference, because it's light years ahead of our ability to cover.

    ' course, Congress COULD alter or abolish ANY of these entitlement programs at any time. All these articles start with the implied or expressed premise that these programs are set in stone or that retirees have this money set aside for them in their name, which of course is WRONG.

    The Moron-in-Chief today is bragging about these programs, and implying that those mean, evil, rich Repubs are just dyin' to abolish 'em, so those old folk can eat dog food and keep those filthy rich scuzballs in the lap of luxury.

    It'll take a complete collapse to stop these monsters from spending money we don't have.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT