How have state workers fared under performance pay? Good question.

August 13, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State workers could be accused of dreaming about this while the economy is still stuck in the mud, but when tax dollars begin refilling the coffers, public employees might start getting raises again.

Their pay was frozen last year and this year as revenue shriveled. In the three prior years, they had shifted to Gov. Mitch Daniels’ performance pay system, and it’s probably safe to assume Daniels would stick with at least some portion of the system if raises were to be handed out during his final two years in office.

Discerning how employees actually fared under the performance system compared to the old days of across-the-board raises is a heavy lift. Virtually nothing about the years when they received performance pay is apples-to-apples, says Dwight Dorsey, who oversees the information system for the state’s human resources department. Layoffs and other turnover are the main complications.

Here’s what is known:

In 2007, the first full year under the new system, the state handed out a total of $35.6 million in raises and bonuses tied to good work. That included $34.6 million added to baseline wages by exceeding agency expectations, nearly $1 million in bonuses handed out in on-the-spot recognition of outstanding performance, and $49,000 in Public Service Achievement Awards for measurable accomplishments.

Just over 25,000 employees received raises and 1,800 received none.

In 2008, the total was $31.4 million to 26,797 employees in about the same proportions as the previous year. Just over 700 received no raise.

How do you feel about performance pay for state workers? Has it improved service? Should it be extended by Daniels’ successor?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Another idea
    What would be more interesting, would be to find out if the top employees have been leaving because pay has remained the same, whereas insurance costs have gone up 1000%. So, we got a pay cut for the same work, for the past 3 years. Wonder who is leaving, and what kind of workers are left behind?
  • Reward the good employees
    To get no raise for 2009 or 2010, is robbery for those good employees who would have otherwise received raises. Ever heard of inflation? and health care costs? The good people are actually making less and who knows if they will get raises in 2011. What's worse is that even if you get a "promotion" into a higher paid position at the state, you either take the job with no pay increase or lose out on advancing your career. It's a horrible decision either way. And trust me, we do not want all the good people to leave employment there. I can't even fathom how things would operate then.
    What Mitch is trying to do for Indiana is great, but when he's hurting so many of the people that work for him to do it, that's not great. Of course the raises should be performance-based. There are slackers at every company, why would anyone want to pay them more? But you've got to reward the good people.
  • State workers are suffering what most private sector employees are facing. no pay raises, cuts in pay and increases in health insurance.

    Of course the alternative for public employees is to give them payraises and increase taxes which hurts them and private sector employees or layoffs. Take the lack of pay raises for now and when life gets better, the raises will come. Having a job is better than the alternative right now.
  • Its Hot Outside at State Office Building
    It worked as well as the Smoking Ban on State Property.

    Not
  • Pay for Performance?
    Think of it this way.

    Mitch Roob created a huge mess at FSSA and he got a pay raise and promotion to head IEDC.

    He gets paid more than Michael S. (â??Mickeyâ??) Maurer and Nathan Feltman combined with fewer results.

    Channel 13: Where are the jobs?

    http://www.wthr.com/Global/category.asp?C=189918



  • Pay for Performance
    This would work better if all supervisors were fair when doing appraisals. Some feel they need to be fair to everyone so everyone gets the same evaluation and raise. We are also having more money pulled out of our pocket with the insurance and cost of living increases.
  • Treated badly
    I've heard that state employees are treated badly and it isn't just the raises or lack of them. One department I know of the employees can't even speak to one another while they are working. And if they slip and do talk they can be pulled aside and written up or fired. I can't remember being treated like this on any of my past positions. I think the last time was in school. Can you imagine going into work and not being able to talk??? Also this department has been made to obey the new dress code and no one but the employees get into this department. It is closed to the public. So what's the big deal if they wear blue jeans, a tee shirt and tennis shoes. Pure tyranny!!!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT