Should journalists contribute to politicians?

September 16, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Three Indiana newspaper executives show up on a newly published list of journalists and media professionals who donated to politicians running for a federal office in the 2010 election cycle. The list, compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, includes:

—Dick Inskeep of The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne. Inskeep, who is retired as publisher of the paper but remains president of The Journal Gazette Co., made two donations totaling $4,800 to Dr. Tom Hayhurst, a former Fort Wayne city council member and the Democrat running against Republican Marlin Stutzman for the 3rd Congressional District seat held by Mark Souder. Souder resigned in May after admitting to an affair.

—Jeff Brown, president of Home News Enterprises in Columbus and the fifth generation of the family to manage the newspaper company. Brown gave $1,000 to U.S. Rep. Mike Pence, a Republican from Columbus. Pence’s 6th District all but surrounds the city, where Home News publishes The Republic. Two other papers the company owns, the Daily Journal in Franklin and the Daily Reporter in Greenfield, are near the district’s western border.

—Tom Gettinger, co-owner and managing editor of the Sullivan Daily Times, gave $250 to U.S. Rep. Brad Ellsworth, a Democrat whose 8th District includes the southeastern Indiana town. Ellsworth early this year opted to give up his seat to run for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Evan Bayh. Ellsworth is opposed by Republican Dan Coats. Coats, incidentally, received $400 from a Nashville, Tenn., sports writer, Harold Huggins.

To see the entire list of journalist donations, go here and look for the Media Donations link. State and local donations were beyond the scope of the survey, so the numbers may well have been greater had the more localized campaigns been included.

Whether it’s significant that journalists are donating to politicians depends on one’s point of view. It’s certainly an ongoing discussion in the field. The independent, not-for-profit Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks the flow of money in politics, stops short of condemning the practice.

Traditionalists argue that donations create a conflict of interest or at least a perception of a conflict that undermines news organizations’ credibility; a publisher’s involvement especially can open a newspaper to charges of influencing news stories. The other end of the spectrum contends that journalists are no less citizens than anyone else, so shouldn’t be restricted from taking part in politics.

Newspapers have some of the strictest ethics policies on political activity. The larger papers in particular pointedly forbid news employees from participating in politics at any level, donations included. Move beyond newspapers to broadcast media, magazines and online sites, and policies differ dramatically.

It should be pointed out that the authority of executives like Inskeep, Brown and Gettinger extends beyond the news side to include advertising and circulation, so they’re not news employees. They also play influential, if not deciding, roles in setting the papers’ official positions on op/ed pages—a responsibility decidedly outside the definition of news reporting and editing.

Where do you think the line should be drawn?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Sunshine
    No different than Fox News contributing $1mil to Republicans. Let them, as long as it's all public information. Besides, if you forbid them, they will find a way indirectly.
  • Revealing
    These people will have political opinions anyway, whether they're allowed to donate or not - this just puts their leanings out in the open where their readership will know who they favor or not and will judge them (sometime loudly) accordingly.
  • Double Standards
    Oh my, when corporations dump millions into the pockets of republican politcal candidates all is honky dory. But a reporter does it and the sky fall in. What a two faced stand.
    • big money both parties
      University of California $1,648,685 Goldman Sachs $1,013,091 Harvard University $878,164 Microsoft Corp $852,167 Google Inc $814,540 JPMorgan Chase & Co $808,799 Citigroup Inc $736,771 Time Warner $624,618 Sidley Austin LLP $600,298 Stanford University $595,716 National Amusements Inc $563,798 WilmerHale LLP $550,668 Columbia University $547,852 Skadden, Arps et al $543,539 UBS AG $532,674 IBM Corp $532,372 General Electric $529,855 US Government $513,308 Morgan Stanley $512,232 Latham & Watkins $503,295 short list of obama's donors

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

    2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

    3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

    4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

    5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).

    ADVERTISEMENT