Pick your (bug) poison

September 29, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Humankind’s never-ending battle against pestilence has produced yet another unintended consequence: proteins from genetically altered crops in surface water.

A study conducted by the University of Notre Dame and Loyola University looked at 217 streams, drains and ditches near Indiana cornfields and found the bug-killing protein in 50 of them at rates above the detectable level of six nanograms per liter. The protein is carried to surface water by runoff and by the leaves and stalks that sometimes wash into streams. And the protein lingers. The study was conducted six months after harvest.

An article about the study is here.

The protein is taken from a soil bacteria and inserted in corn to kill the European corn borer. When the insects chomp on the corn plants, presto, they die—no environmentally unfriendly pesticides needed. Farmers have received the science so enthusiastically that the seeds were used for 85 percent of the U.S. corn crop last year. Mycogen, the brand owned by Indianapolis-based Dow AgroSciences, is just one company pitching the product.

The paper, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, says it is not known whether the trace levels of the protein are a threat to invertebrates in the water.

Farmers are having a hard time winning. Traditional pesticides kept finding their way into water, and now it’s apparent that poison from genetically modified crops is, too.

A related dilemma raised in the study is the ways farmers till, or don’t till, the soil. Farmers minimized tillage to save money and to leave crop residue on the surface where it can keep soil and chemicals from washing into streams. But the residue is now leaching the bug-killing proteins into water.

If bug control is coming down to the least of available evils, which poison do you pick?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT