Privatized economic development still controversial

October 11, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The old debate in Indiana over whether economic development can be accomplished better outside of state government is spreading to other states. But the there’s no more agreement than ever.

Indiana replaced the Department of Commerce with the privatized Indiana Economic Development Corp. in 2005. At the time, newly elected Gov. Mitch Daniels said private operation, including board members appointed from the private sector, would help the agency move faster to attract jobs.

Ohio and Iowa are the latest states to consider the idea, as Republican candidates for governor in those states call for abandoning their state-run agencies.

“No more bureaucrats, no more bungling, no more tripping over one another,” said U.S. Rep. John Kasich, who has been supported by Daniels in his run for governor of Ohio.

Indiana’s IEDC collected mixed reviews in an Associated Press story about the trend. House Speaker Pat Bauer, a Democrat, was noted for his call to reform IEDC following reports of job commitments that didn’t materialize. John Krauss, who directs the Indiana University Public Policy Institute and was a deputy mayor under former Indianapolis Mayor Bill Hudnut, a Republican, opined that private operation allows for attracting private donations in an era of angry taxpayers.

Scandals aren’t unique to either public or private agencies. In Iowa, allegations of fraud, abuse and sloppy bookkeeping cost the jobs of five workers in the state’s film promotion office; Florida’s privatized organization doled out millions of dollars in incentives to companies that joined the group’s board.

In your mind, what works best—public or private? Any thoughts on how you like IEDC now that it’s been in operation for awhile?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Privatized Economic Development
    Either model works, i.e. public or private, as long as everyone is on the same page with regard to long-term strategic plan. Injecting politics into economic development never works.
    • What Say You?
      Huh? Public policies create the environment for businesses to succeed or fail while providing the quality of life services to the public. Maybe you can revise and extend your remarks?

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    ADVERTISEMENT