Crews to shore up roof at 2-year-old Palladium

April 11, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

PalladiumSpring performances at Carmel’s 2-year-old Palladium are not expected to be affected by interior construction work at the venue set to begin in mid-April.

The $140,000 project, managed by Indianapolis-based contractor Shiel Sexton on behalf of the Carmel Redevelopment Commission, should last about three weeks.

Construction of the $119 million city-owned concert hall was halted in mid-2009 after an inspection revealed a rip in the structural steel supporting the venue’s signature domed roof. Work resumed after extensive repairs, and the city in 2011 sued Michigan-based contractor Steel Supply & Engineering Co. for breach of contract and negligence.

The new roof work was recommended during a review conducted as part of the ongoing litigation, according to a city news release. Community relations spokeswoman Melanie Lentz declined to answer questions about the project, citing the pending lawsuit.
 
Crews will retrofit the roof trusses, the release said, welding additional stiffeners and small plates in place.

The Palladium is the centerpiece of the three-venue Center for the Performing Arts. IBJ reported last month that the theaters sold about 145,000 tickets during the 2011-2012 season.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Not understanding the cost??
    If this is a breach of contract/negligence issue with the steel supplier, why is the full cost not being borne by them? Shouldn't a 2-yr old building be fully covered by insurance or a warranty? The taxpayers should not have to foot this bill.
    • Who Knows?
      One never knows what the real story is in Carmel so who knows what the real deal is with this situation. And we'll never know unless the situation reaches critical mass such as when the Carmel Redevelopment Commission became insolvent and then the citizens of Carmel had to bail them out to the tune of $200 million.
    • Mitigation
      Because a party has a duty to mitigate its damages.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

    2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

    3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

    4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

    5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

    ADVERTISEMENT