'Tired' owner pulls plug on Fishers garden center

April 22, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

About 600 people turned out Saturday to bid on equipment and inventory—including lawn art, shrubs and trees—from a Fishers garden center that is closing after nearly a decade.

The “inventory reduction” sale at Seasons Gardens ran from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m., said Seth Seaton, Key Auctioneers’ director of real estate.

Seasons Gardens sold inventory and equipment April 20, 2013Seasons Gardens sold off its garden center inventory and equipment April 20. (Photo courtesy of Key Auctioneers)

Business owner Michael Akin said he is closing the retail operation to pursue a career as a travertine stone distributor. He also may continue to offer landscape design services on his own.

In addition to the retail garden center, Seasons Gardens provided landscape design, landscape and hardscape installation and sold water features and pond supplies.

Seasons Gardens opened at the southeast corner of Cumberland Road and 126th Street in 2004, Akin said, and at its peak had about 25 employees. The business now employs three people, he said.

“There was just too much overhead to make it work,” Akin said, given the competition from “nine box [home-improvement] stores within 10 miles.”

The property, which includes a 9,120-square-foot, two-story building and 4.4 acres of commercially zoned land, is on the market for $975,000. Akin said he will continue to use the site until it sells.

Saturday’s auction raised enough money to pay the business’ taxes and allow the company to avoid bankruptcy, Akin said, but he and his partners will not recoup their investments.

“It was an unfortunate combination of things,” he said of the company’s demise. "Mostly, I'm just tired. This is a tough business."

  • Tough.
    Tough to sympathize with Akin. Try interviewing past clients and past co-contractors about his integrity, or lack there of.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing