Sneak a peek at Noblesville's long-awaited Riverwalk

May 15, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Construction crews are putting the finishing touches on a pedestrian path along the White River in Noblesville—a $2 million-plus project that took more than a decade to come to fruition.

Residents formed a committee in 2001 to discuss raising money for a riverfront walkway. Work on the first phase began in 2008 with an array of public and private funding; phase two started last spring.

Now known as Riverwalk, the paved path follows the eastern riverbank under Conner Street, linking a Riverview Hospital parking lot on the south side of the busy road with the Hamilton County Judicial Center to the north.

From there, it loops around a grassy area behind the courthouse before passing beneath Logan Street and emerging on the other side as a boardwalk of sorts overlooking the water. (Pro tip: Avert your eyes from the electric substation towering to the east.)

RiverWalk, NoblesvilleNoblesville's Riverwalk overlooks the White River. (IBJ photo/Andrea Muirragui Davis)

Not far upstream, the path ties into the existing White River Greenway pedestrian bridge leading to Forest Park.

A ribbon-cutting ceremony is planned for the end of the month, but officials are seeking funding for a third phase to spruce up the green space between Conner and Logan streets.

Eventually, plans call for extending the path south from the Conner Street bridge.

As it stands, Riverwalk spans less than a mile from stem to stern, but officials nevertheless say it provides a crucial connection to the city’s quaint downtown—and highlights the river as a community asset.  

What’s your take on the project: Is an evening stroll along the river worth a seven-figure investment?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Wow...
    I can't even wrap my head around that number for a path less than a mile long. Seems like a tremendous waste....
  • Price
    That does seem a bit steep, but since much of it functions as a boardwalk using rudimentary bridge engineering, I suppose it would be pricey. Too bad about the substation.
  • River Walk
    Keeping our small town unique, historical but recognizing our need to appeal to visitors, our community - it is positive to have the River Walk. I don't mind paying it forward for this project. We need to continue to improve. We are the county seat of Hamilton. I think it is important for us to embrace this in the look of our downtown.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT