Cozy quarters could cost Hamilton County $11.5M

July 9, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An outside consultant is evaluating options for relieving the space crunch at the Hamilton County Government & Judicial Center, and officials hope to begin construction next year.

But first, they have to figure out the best location for the new offices.

County commissioners want to move the auditor, assessor, treasurer, recorder and surveyor operations to free up space for a growing court system.

Among the possibilities: adding on to the existing government center in downtown Noblesville (the intent when it was constructed in 1992) and building a facility on county-owned land east of State Road 37 (an option that has created a stir among downtown boosters).

Indianapolis-based Architura Corp. is conducting a feasibility study, and commissioners are asking the County Council to earmark up to $11.5 million for the project.

The elected bodies conducted a joint meeting Monday to discuss funding priorities for as much as $58.5 million in bonds expected to be issued to replace debt coming off the county’s books in 2013 and 2014.

Commissioners want the seven-member council—the county’s fiscal body—to hold off on issuing all the bonds until they can work the office-space puzzle and put together a funding proposal.

“These needs are pressing and we need to resolve them,” Commissioner Christine Altman said.

Also on the commissioners’ wish list:

— $9.9 million for public safety equipment
— $9.2 million for communications software
— $6.9 million for bridge projects
— $4 million for highway department facilities
— $3.2 million for a video surveillance system at the jail
— $3.1 million for buildings and grounds maintenance
— $2.6 million to update the fiber ring connecting county buildings and municipalities
— $2 million to complete the RiverWalk path along the White River
— $1.6 million for parks’ department projects and land acquisition
— $1.2 million for a multi-use storage facility for the highway department, emergency management agency and sheriff’s department
 
Council President Brad Beaver said members will review the requests this month.

A proposed timetable laid out by county attorney Mike Howard suggested the council introduce ordinances in August in order to conduct public hearings and sell bonds before the end of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT