Carmel council to reconsider Civic Theatre arts grant

August 16, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two weeks after it held back $200,000 in grant funding earmarked for the Booth Tarkington Civic Theatre, the Carmel City Council is poised to swap checks with the not-for-profit organization.

Council members on Monday will consider a resolution disbursing the arts grant—as soon as the Civic makes a $200,000 annual payment on the building it occupies in Carmel’s swanky Center for the Performing Arts.

“When we receive the check, they’ll get their money,” said Councilor Luci Snyder, who chairs the panel’s Finance Committee. “We’ve got to protect the taxpayers.”

Snyder and council President Rick Sharp are sponsoring the resolution after voting with the majority Aug. 5 to delay the grant until they were sure the scheduled payment would be made. Late last year, the Civic renegotiated its purchase agreement with the Carmel Redevelopment Commission, cutting an expected $400,000 installment in half.

“They said they have the money and will make the payment now,” Snyder said.

The council signs off on arts grants from the city’s Support for the Arts Fund every year. Mayor Jim Brainard makes recommendations after an application-and-review process. This year, he asked for $707,756 for 15 arts groups, including the Civic.

But Sharp tabled the measure when it was introduced in April, saying the council would not vote until members understood how the mayor intended to close a seven-figure budget shortfall. Satisfied that the money is available, members approved grants to the other organizations earlier this month.



Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............