Fishers councilor Cox kicking off mayoral run

October 11, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fishers Town Council member Renee Cox is set to kick off her mayoral campaign Saturday, formally announcing her candidacy after months of speculation.

Cox, 42, is serving her first term on the seven-member council, which acts as the fast-growing suburb’s executive and legislative bodies. An appointed town manager runs day-to-day affairs.

renee cox fishers mayor race mugRenee Cox

But residents voted last year to turn the town of 80,000 into a second-class city with an elected mayor and nine-member city council. In May, they’ll return to the polls to choose partisan candidates for mayor, council and city clerk.

The general election will follow in November, but primary battles can be heated in the overwhelmingly Republican community.

Former Town Council President Walt Kelly was the first to enter the race, in July. Town Manager Scott Fadness has said he’s considering a run but has not announced a decision yet.

Cox, a self-employed health care professional, said she is enjoying her part-time council role but wants to make a bigger impact on her adopted hometown. She and husband David moved to Fishers from Connersville in 2005.

If elected, she plans to call on her sales and marketing experience—her resume includes stints at Omnicare Inc. and Grandview Pharmacy—to sell Fishers to businesses and residents alike.

“We have highly educated and talented residents here in Fishers and a quality of life that is not commonly found,” she said in a prepared statement. “Companies throughout the country may find a new ‘home’ in Fishers … and I will seek them out and bring them here.”

Cox is vice president of the Hoosier Heritage Port Authority, which owns and maintains 37 miles of railroad from Tipton to downtown Indianapolis, and serves as the council’s representative to Fishers’ Parks and Recreation Committee.

Before joining the council, Cox served one year on the Fall Creek Township board as its president.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • No voter base
    She is a nice person, but not qualified to be mayor. This will come down to Scott Fadness (who has put Fishers finances in great shape the last 4 years and holds a masters in public affairs) or Walt Kelly who is a long term public servant of Fishers and served as Town Council President until 2000.
    • Agree
      Spot on Bob. A 1 yr stint on Fall creek board and less than full term on council won't cut it. Reminds me of Obama who didn't really build the wisdom to lead before presidency. Fadness should be a good choice from fiscal standpoint

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT