Pace slows, but Carmel redevelopment panel still busy

November 4, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Carmel Redevelopment Commission has a lot to do—with or without staff support.

It’s looking for a new user for the former Shapiro’s Delicatessen on Range Line Road, for example, and it’s working with developers interested in overhauling the old Party Time Rentals site a few blocks south.

Then there the projects already in progress, like Pedcor Cos.’ The Nash building and Anderson Birkla’s The Mezz, both under construction in Carmel City Center. The CRC’s responsibilities include streetscaping and utility relocation.

For years, the volunteer board’s efforts were guided by paid staff. But longtime Executive Director Les Olds and his lone remaining employee resigned last month, and Mayor Jim Brainard told IBJ he won’t rush to hire a new leader. (Subscribers: Read the full story here.)

Brainard and city Director of Administration Steve Engelking will handle day-to-day affairs in the meantime.

“This is a good chance to step back and re-evaluate how the CRC works and who we need in those positions,” Brainard said.

Redevelopment activity slowed this year as the City Council exerted control over commission spending after agreeing to refinance $184 million in CRC debt.

The CRC collects revenue from 27 of the city’s tax-increment financing districts. Bond payments and other obligations consume most of it.

Indeed, the commission expects to close out this year with a balance of less than $70,000, board Vice President Dave Bowers told the council last month.

That’s after giving the city $1.5 million to help pay for operations and expenses it inherited as a result of the refinancing deal. Approved in July, the grant was paid Oct. 21—just before council members voted on the 2014 budget.

Brainard broke a 3-3 tie to pass the $127 million spending plan. The divisive issue: whether to cut the budget as a result of a seven-figure loss of revenue from the CRC.

City leaders were expecting $2 million from the CRC next year, but longtime financial adviser Curt Coonrod told councilors that new projections “lead us to believe that is unlikely to materialize.” The commission instead will contribute about $500,000, he said.

Bowers mentioned the sale of CRC-owned real estate—including the Shapiro’s and Party Time sites—as a possible revenue boost that could increase the grant.

But city Clerk-Treasurer Diana Cordray told IBJ the commission is obligated to return any proceeds to the TIF fund used to purchase the property. (She asked the State Board of Accounts for clarification on the law in 2010 and still has a copy of the email exchange.)

State auditors take a strict stance on how TIF revenue can be used; their most recent CRC review dinged the commission for spending it on operational expenses.

The CRC’s attorneys have a different take on the rules, Brainard said. “Our legal advice was to the contrary.”

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Directions
    The Old Party Time is South of Shapiros not North?
    • Yes, thanks!
      You're right, Randy. I fixed my mistake. Thank you!
    • CRC Truth
      The only thing the CRC has to do is pay it bills and bonds and the clerk/treasurer office is doing that. I am tried of the Brainard Administration using taxpayer money to do the work of private developers. These projects are private developments that already have gotten TIF. They can oversee their own projects.
    • Nice Job
      Captured the meeting in word and deed. The comment about streetscaping is ironic. I fear we will spend money we don't have streetscaping our 'new' US 31 segment. As far as Utility relocation I find that interesting. I would really like to hear more about what that might entail.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

    2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

    3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

    4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

    5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

    ADVERTISEMENT