Fishers seeking public input on tax-hike proposal

November 5, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fishers’ Town Council is convening a special meeting next week to hear what residents think of a proposal to raise the food-and-beverage tax by 1 percent.

A public hearing is set for 7 p.m. Nov. 12 at Town Hall. It is the only item on the agenda.

Councilors won’t vote until next month.

Legislators authorized the tax hike this year, with certain restrictions: Officials must decide whether to proceed by Dec. 31, and any revenue from the increase can only be used to fund economic development or lower the town’s tax levy.

A 1-percent increase is expected to generate about $1 million a year.

Town Council member (and mayoral candidate) Renee Cox already has said she does not support the proposal, emailing a statement Monday saying she opposes “any new tax that adds to the burden of small businesses ... and Fishers families.”

“Taxing should not be a fiscal conservatives’ solution,” she wrote. “I strongly support economic development and believe there is a better way to fund it.”

Fishers Chamber of Commerce Chairwoman Kelly Marburger Novak, meanwhile, sent the council a letter expressing the chamber board’s support for the proposal.

“The Fishers Chamber places economic development as a top priority and we believe that our town needs to continue to grow in order to maintain our superior quality of  life,” she wrote.

The increase shouldn't put Fishers restaurants at a competitive disadvantage, she said, since other communities in Hamilton County have collected the additional 1 percent for years.

Hamilton County was one of the six counties surrounding Indianapolis that approved a 1-percent food-and-beverage tax eight years ago to help build Lucas Oil Stadium. Counties keep half the revenue and transfer the rest to Marion County’s Capital Improvement Board, which owns the stadium.

At the time, individual communities were given the option of instituting an additional 1-percent tax for their own use. Officials in Carmel, Noblesville and Westfield seized the opportunity, but Fishers decided not to participate.

Town Council President John Weingardt said no decision will be made without plenty of community feedback. A second public hearing is scheduled during the council’s regular meeting Nov. 18.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Renee for Mayor
    Government creating economic development through tax hikes has been a proven folly. Let the marketplace decide!
  • 1% tax
    This tax does not sound like much but we are getting taxed to the eyeballs. Economic development will not help seniors like myself who are retired. We do not get an increase in our pay, plus the School systems are currently robbing us blind. The only people this increase will help are the developers and politicians. I urge the Council to vote against this tax. Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize the private sector. We are already paying for and still paying for the sports venues in Marion County, and quite frankly I am sick and tired of it. Judith Coons

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT