Developer wants Fishers to take over Saxony Beach

November 15, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Saxony HallFoundation work is Saxony Hallunder way for the next phase of Republic Development Corp.’s Saxony Village project, which includes a lakefront community building that it wants to turn over to the town of Fishers along with Saxony Beach.

Situated on a 20-acre man-made lake just north of 131st Street in the Saxony development, the 300-foot stretch of sand has been open to the public for the last two summers. Lifeguards watch over a roped-off swimming area, and a private vendor rents kayaks and other water-sports equipment.

Now the developer and town are working on an agreement that calls for the beach and planned community building to be owned and operated by Fishers.

The town and Republic would split the $1.1 million cost of constructing the 4,500-square-foot Saxony Hall, which could house parks programs and special events. Once it’s complete, the developer would dedicate the land and building to the town in exchange for $586,100 in future park-impact fee credits.

Fishers then would be responsible for maintaining the building, lake and beach as a public park facility. Officials estimated expenses at about $100,000 a year, including the cost of hiring a firm to provide and manage lifeguards.

Town Manager Scott Fadness said officials have been impressed by the popularity of the beach, which drew 20,000-plus visitors this year. The town also was drawn to the opportunity to add a public community building in what he said is an area under-served by parks facilities.

“We weren’t in the market for beachfront, but the offer was intriguing to us,” he said. “It’s a unique amenity for the town.”

Officials hope to finalize the deal and complete design work over the winter so construction can begin next spring. If all goes as planned, the building (and its public restrooms) could open before the end of beach season, said Sean McKinnies, senior vice president of Saxony Management Co.

In addition to housing parks programs, a town-owned Saxony Hall would be available to rent for special events. The single-story building could accommodate about 150 guests at eight-foot round tables, McKinnies said.

When it’s completely built out, Saxony’s Lake District could have as much as 100,000 square feet of commercial space and 600 multifamily housing units, he said.

If the foundation work gets done before Mother Nature turns down the thermostat for good this year, the first lakefront mixed-use building could “go vertical” before the beach opens, McKinnies said. Plans call for a two-story, 8,700-square-foot building with ground-floor restaurant space and four loft apartments.

“We hope to land a tenant in time to open [the building] with the beach in early summer,” he said. “That will give the restaurant operator the opportunity to take advantage of the season.”

An 11,000-square-foot office/retail building overlooking the lake also is planned.

What’s your take on the proposal(s)?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Is the water safe?
    We went there a couple of times. The sand base is rock hard, and I wonder if the algae are toxic as at Geist Reservoir. Is the water tested?
    • No tax dollars
      BTW, there is no reason that such a facility can't be private and self-sustaining. Pay to play, don't hit taxpayers.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

    2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

    3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

    4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

    5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

    ADVERTISEMENT