Council delays decision on fate of Fishers tax

December 3, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fishers’ Town Council postponed its decision on a proposed 1-percent food-and-beverage tax Monday night, tabling the measure quickly and without comment rather than carry out an expected vote.

Councilors aren’t ready to deliver a verdict, Vice President Pete Peterson said later, but they’re working on it. “There’s still a lot of discussion going on,” he said.

State lawmakers gave Fishers permission to impose the tax this year, as long as the town uses the revenue—projected to be $1 million a year—to reduce property taxes or fund economic development.

Since the open-ended proposal was introduced to the council Nov. 4, the town’s governing body has held two public hearings and collected about 30 letters from residents. Peterson says the delay ensures members have the chance to process the (mostly negative) feedback.

But it also could buy enough time to address opponents’ complaint that it doesn’t make sense to impose a levy without tying it to a specific economic development project.

Town leaders have said several deals are in the works, including one council veteran Scott Faultless last month said could represent a $100 million investment in the community.

Peterson said it’s possible that one of those pending projects could “come to fruition” by the end of the year, the deadline for Fishers to impose the tax.

A majority of the seven-member council would have to agree to get the food-and-beverage measure back on a council agenda. It has one regular meeting remaining on Dec. 16, and President John Weingardt could convene a special session if necessary to revisit the proposal.

Freshman Councilor Renee Cox, an outspoken opponent of the tax, is glad the council is taking its time. “Listening is always good,” she said.

Earlier Monday, the Town Council, Fishers Redevelopment Commission and Fishers Economic Development Commission unanimously approved an incentive deal with growing construction firm Meyer Najem, which plans to build a $5.5 million headquarters and office building downtown.

The project agreement calls for the town to contribute 1.7 acres of land and $1.4 million. Fishers also will share in any profits from the eventual sale of the building, said Community Development Director Tom Dickey.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Why all the fuss?
    Let's say you spend $200 a week to eat out. You can probably afford to spend $202 if the tax is passed. No one that I know avoids eating in Carmel, Westfield, or Noblesville because of the 1% tax they have. And I haven't noticed hoards of people flocking to Fishers from Carmel, Westfield, or Noblesville in order to avoid the 1% tax. Tie it to economic development and let's move on.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.

ADVERTISEMENT