Economic distress doesn't recognize county lines

December 12, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

OK, be honest: How many North of 96th-ers saw IBJ’s Dec. 7 story about the Connec2Help 2-1-1 call center and thought, “That has nothing to do with me. I live in an affluent suburb”?

Turns out you’re only partially right. Although Hamilton and Boone counties are indeed home to upscale communities, such locales are not immune to problems like unemployment, homelessness and food insecurity.

Economic, emotional and physical catastrophes don’t recognize county lines.

During the last fiscal year, in fact, more than 3,200 Hamilton County residents called the Connect2Help referral service; 635 Boone County residents sought help by phone. About the same number searched an online database of services.

The top need in both counties: housing. Utility assistance was a close second. Food requests were among the top five “unmet” needs, usually the result of a resource not being available or the caller not qualifying for help.

Connect2Help serves 25 Indiana counties, including Boone and Hamilton. Its resource specialists act as matchmakers of sorts, referring clients to the agencies that deliver services.

To the uninitiated, it may seem like an additional layer of bureaucracy. To clients, it’s a lifeline—making efficient, effective connections when they’re needed the most.

That disconnect is straining resources at Connect2Help and other centers like it. The 2-1-1 network is accessible to about 90 percent of U.S. residents, including all of Indiana, but public funding for the initiative is scarce.  

“People on the street who need a place to stay tonight know about us,” Operations Director Shari Morgan told my Hamilton County Leadership Academy class last month. “People who can make a difference with funding don’t.”

What’s your take on the level of need north of 96th Street and the resources available to address it?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Extremely Important
    My organization helped conduct a housing needs assessment in 2013, and there certainly are a lot of households in Hamilton County who are cost burdened by their housing. It's even more challenging when you consider transportation costs associated with suburban communities. The average household spends 59% of their income on housing and transportation. Hamilton County Area Neighborhood Development (HAND) is a nonprofit actively working to address these issues. You can learn more and find out how to get involved at our web-site: www.handincorporated.org. There is no limiting our possibility of finding a solution to these challenges, except for those limits we place on each other. I'm confident these communities will find creative solutions that contribute to healthy, vibrant and sustainable communities.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT