Bus-ad amendment aims to help schools boost revenue

March 3, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Senators voted 49-0 last week in favor of a bill that could help Westfield Washington Schools and other publicly funded districts keep their buses on the road.

House Bill 1062 also picked up an amendment in the Senate that would allow three cash-strapped central Indiana districts—including Zionsville Community Schools—to test the idea of accepting school-bus advertising to help pay for transportation.

State Rep. Todd Huston, the bill’s author, supports the amendment from Sen. Pat Miller, telling IBJ on Monday that it could allow districts to tap new sources of revenue. Eleven states already allow advertising on school buses.

The measure now returns to the House, which passed the original legislation 94-0 on Jan. 30. Huston said while the bill may get some final fine-tuning in conference committee, he expects it to land on Gov. Mike Pence’s desk this month.

Although the new bus-advertising provision is grabbing headlines, he said the primary purpose of the bill is to fix a problematic state law that is jeopardizing school transportation budgets.

As IBJ reported in January, nearly 60 school districts across the state stand to lose at least 20 percent of the tax revenue collected for transportation, bus replacement and capital projects (think building maintenance and technology upgrades) because of so-called protected levy legislation set to take effect this year.

Westfield Washington, which could lose 91 percent of its transportation funding, has notified the state Department of Education that it will stop transporting students to school in three years unless the situation is resolved.

Zionsville schools could lose about 52 percent of a $3 million annual transportation levy without the fix HB 1062 offers. Officials say advertising on its 74 buses could produce $10,000-$60,000 per year, based on results in similar-sized districts in other states.

“Obviously, we’re interested in that,” said Chief Financial Officer Mike Shaver.

What’s your take on the transportation problem—and potential solutions?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • More micro managing by state legislature
    If they would let local school boards make their own decisions, instead of the ongoing micromanagement, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT