Hamilton County planning to test CNG-fueled vehicles

March 10, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Faced with double-digit increases in annual utility costs—and the promise of more to come—Hamilton County has been trying to make its 31 buildings more efficient. Before long, it could start producing some power of its own.

As IBJ reported this week, county commissioners are working on a plan to install rooftop solar panels on public buildings. (Subscribers: Catch up here.) But they’re also looking to take their energy-savings efforts on the road.

If County Council approves the expenditure, officials hope to begin converting county-owned vehicles to run on compressed natural gas. It doesn’t take a mathematician to see the benefit of filling tanks for less than $1 a gallon.

It costs about $6,000 to retrofit a gasoline-fed vehicle to run on either fuel, said Buildings and Grounds chief Steve Wood. The biggest expense (about $1.5 million at last estimate) would be adding a CNG filling station to service the county’s fleet.

Proponents have been researching the technology for about a year, Commissioner Mark Heirbrandt said, and a formal funding request could come as soon as this month.

“We had a positive meeting” with council members who offered input on the CNG project, Heirbrandt said.

Officials have been working to cut utility costs for years as the county adjusts to state tax caps and other funding challenges. First up were LED lighting and better building-control systems. Today, commissioners are expected to vote on a contract with Indianapolis-based Johnson Melloh Solutions for about $1.3 million in equipment upgrades.

Rather than refurbish the 21-year-old Government Center chillers, for example, crews will replace them with energy-efficient air compressors. The all-electric building also will get natural gas service.

While they’re working on those projects, contractors will prepare the roof for a planned building expansion and the possible solar installation.

Wood praised the commissioners’ effort to come up with a comprehensive approach to finding utility savings.

“They’re looking at what we can do to reduce energy use, improve air quality and make the greatest impact on taxpayers,” said Wood, who also serves on the Noblesville Common Council.


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.