Lawmakers OK bill keeping school buses on the road

March 18, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Legislators delivered a temporary reprieve to Westfield Washington Schools and other cash-strapped districts facing steep losses in their transportation budgets.

But the final version of House Bill 1062, approved by both chambers last week with just one no vote, did not include a Senate amendment that also would have allowed some schools to test the market for school-bus advertising.

“We would have explored options, had we been part of the pilot, but it came up so quickly that we really hadn't even started to look into options,” said Mark Keen, Westfield Washington’s superintendent.

As IBJ reported in January, Westfield Washington is one of nearly 60 school districts across the state that stand to lose at least 20 percent of the tax revenue collected for transportation, bus replacement and capital because of so-called protected levy legislation intended to make sure they pay their debt.

Westfield Washington, which stood to lose 91 percent of its transportation funding, notified the state Department of Education last year that it would stop transporting students to school in 2016 unless the situation was resolved.

The legislative fix, which is still awaiting Gov. Mike Pence’s signature, lets districts spread their tax-cap losses over several funds rather than requiring that debt-service accounts remain whole. It applies to districts facing losses of 10 percent or more—about 90 statewide.

It’s just a stop-gap measure, stemming the schools’ losses for three years, but officials say it helps.

“This gives us more time to avoid the loss, and we will continue to work with legislators for a permanent fix,” said Mike Reuter, chief financial officer of Hamilton Southeastern Schools in Fishers.

HSE, Westfield, Noblesville and Zionsville schools are affected by the legislation. Carmel, Sheridan and Hamilton Heights schools all fell under the 10-percent threshold.

“In three years, if we get the growth that we expect, we will still be impacted, but to a much lesser degree,” Westfield’s Keen said.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Sad
    Frankly I think it is sad that we potentially have to turn our children's transportation to school into an advertisement opportunity in order to afford it. I can't wait until we have Lucas Oil High School because we don't see education as the priority that it is.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT