Carmel could tap emergency fund for road repairs

May 6, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel Mayor Jim Brainard wants to take $1.5 million from the city’s Rainy Day Fund to fix streets damaged by the unusually harsh winter.

About $700,000 of that would erase a projected shortfall in Carmel’s annual paving budget—a possibility City Council members raised Monday night—and Brainard asked for the rest to pay for additional repairs resulting from the extreme weather.

“We had no idea how cold and hard the winter would be” during the budgeting process last summer, he said.

If City Council OKs the full amount, the city’s savings account balance would drop to about $7.4 million—less than the recommended 10-percent operating reserve. With debt payments, Carmel’s 2014 general fund budget totals about $77 million.

Brainard said the Rainy Day Fund would be replenished when the state catches up on county option income tax payments, which financial advisor Curt Coonrod told the council could produce an additional $2 million a year in revenue beginning in 2016.

Finance Committee Chairwoman Luci Snyder agreed that the “truly wretched winter” may justify use of the emergency fund, but said the city’s $1.9 million paving budget wasn’t enough to begin with considering the road inventory added through annexation.

Even so, she doesn’t like the idea of dipping below the 10-percent threshold.

“We had a $700,000 hole, so obviously we’re not flush with funds pouring out of every orifice,” she said.

Her committee will take up the budget-reconciliation proposal next week, and the full council will vote on the measure after a May 19 public hearing.

Also Monday, City Council unanimously approved $632,335 in grants to 14 local arts organizations—about $50,000 less than the mayor originally proposed.

Council members delayed action on the 10-year-old grant program last month, saying they needed to clear up questions about the city budget first. Carmel sets aside 1 percent of its general fund for the grants each year, but the final number for 2014 was in dispute.

Brainard ultimately revised his recommendations to accommodate the council’s desired $633,000 maximum, reducing grants by 7.2 percent across the board.  

Snyder praised the move as “unassailably fair,” but Councilor Ron Carter said three organizations will bear the brunt of the pain: Carmel Symphony Orchestra, Booth Tarkington Civic Theatre and  Actors Theatre of Indiana together saw their six-figure grants cut by about $37,000.


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!