Carmel redevelopment panel OKs $730K deal with Palladium contractor

May 7, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel Redevelopment Commission members on Wednesday agreed to pay $730,000 to settle the final piece of a years-old legal dispute tied to construction of the city’s Palladium concert hall, which opened in 2011.

The agreement with concrete contractor Hagerman Construction Corp. represents a substantial savings over the $2 million or so the Fishers-based firm initially claimed it was owed for work on the project, Commissioner Dave Bowers told the panel Wednesday. The CRC took issue with that amount.

“We’ve come a long way from the original discussions,” agreed Executive Director Corrie Meyer. The deal, reached after months of negotiations that included Mayor Jim Brainard and Hagerman Chairman Jeff Hagerman, “feels like a good agreement for all parties.”

The lawsuit was a result of a disagreement over what was owed to the company "as a result of a large, complicated and complex construction project," Brainard and Hagerman said in a joint statement. 

The cash-strapped CRC will use $590,000 in so-called “retainage” funds held back during construction to pay most of the settlement, making up the difference with expected savings in its legal budget, Meyer said.

As IBJ reported in March, the commission has spent more than $6 million since 2009 “responding to, defending and settling” a number of legal claims related to the Palladium project.

In February, the CRC approved a $575,000 settlement with Bloomington-based subcontractor Crider & Crider Inc.,  agreeing to make payments through the end of next year.

Closing out the Hagerman litigation leaves just one Palladium-related lawsuit outstanding:  CRC is suing Steel Supply & Engineering Co. over Palladium roof defects that halted construction amid concerns about a possible structural collapse.

The Michigan firm, meanwhile, denies blame for the faulty design that resulted in a rip in the structural steel web supporting the venue’s domed roof. Steel Supply says that’s the responsibility of the project’s engineer of record, who is not named in the lawsuit.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • HenHouse
    Who was supposed to be overseeing the construction when all of this faulty design and construction work was taking place? I never hear Les Olds or Shiel Sexton being held accountable???
  • Savings
    A great savings by settling a $2 million dollar claim for $730k plus $6 million in legal bills? This kind of math is why Carmel is cash strapped.
  • Suit Expenses
    The $6 million was not all related to this particular lawsuit but all of the various lawsuits related to the Palladium. However, it certainly begs the question of who was overseeing the construction when all of this faulty work was being done. Glad I do not live in Carmel so I do not have to pay for it. Although they have tried to annex me into the tax base...many times.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT