Graeter's planning ice cream shop in Fishers

May 19, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Cincinnati’s famed Graeter’s ice cream is continuing its northern expansion, with plans for a location in Fishers.

Franchise owner Jim Tedesco said it’s too soon to say when the shop will open at Fishers Marketplace, the mixed-use project under construction at State Road 37 and 131st Street.

But plans call for the shop to occupy 1,900 square feet of space alongside tenants such as chicken chain Zaxby’s and Bagger Dave’s Legendary Burger Tavern.

Graeter’s opened its first Indiana location this year at 5560 N. Illinois St. in the Butler-Tarkington neighborhood. The ice cream chain has about 40 shops, mostly in Ohio and Kentucky, and sells its product grocery stores in 46 states.

Founded in 1870, Graeter’s produces its ice cream in two-gallon batches using French pot freezers and a team of “artisans” that mix each flavor by hand. The company says its creamy texture is the result of freezing the ice cream slowly.

Its best seller: Black raspberry chocolate chip, made with Oregon black raspberries and Peter’s Chocolate chips.

This year, the family-owned firm launched its first significant product expansion, introducing gelato and reduced-sugar ice cream.

So what do you think, North of 96thers? Will Graeter's give hometown favorite Handel's a run for its money?

More: Check out IBJ’s review of the Indy location



Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.