Apartments may be added to Noblesville mixed-use project

May 23, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The developer of a commercial project planned at State Road 37 and 146th Street is seeking a zoning change to add a 350-unit apartment complex to the mix.

TM Crowley Development LLC wants to rezone 25 acres of land northeast of the busy intersection to allow for multifamily uses. The 73-acre property—now vacant farmland—is zoned for general business uses.

Carmel-based Crowley also is asking the Noblesville Plan Commission to approve a preliminary development plan for the project, dubbed Conner Crossing.

A general site plan submitted with the request shows residential uses on the northern third of the property and retail/commercial uses closer to 146th Street. Three so-called outlots totaling almost 10 acres would line the east-west thoroughfare.

Crowley principal Tom Crowley did not immediately respond to an IBJ inquiry, but a project description included with the Plan Commission filing said the proposed apartment community would include as many as 352 units in 16 buildings, plus a clubhouse and maintenance facility.
Residential amenities include a “resort-style” swimming pool, fitness center, business center, car wash and “outdoor living area,” according to the description, provided by longtime Indianapolis-based multifamily specialist Sheehan Cos.

Sheehan’s Hamilton County holdings include Maple Knoll Apartments in Westfield and Lakeview Court Apartments in Noblesville.

A veteran commercial real estate developer, Tom Crowley left Gershman Brown Crowley Inc. last year to start his own firm. While with GBC, Crowley helped assemble land for Hamilton Town Center in Noblesville and developed the retail center in collaboration with Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group.

He is still working with the renamed Gershman Partners to finish The Bridges, a mixed-use project at 116th Street and Spring Mill Road in Carmel.

  • more apartments?
    When will this trend end? Most are fairly nice looking, but there have been so many built in recent years. Would love a story on this trend in Indy/suburbs.
  • brother...
    I live one block east at Cumberland and 146th. I will be really sad if this means losing the trees that line 37 at this intersection. I moved from Carmel which lost all of its green space in the 10 years I lived there. I was drawn to this area for all of the open fields. I hope all of this "wonderful development" doesn't drive me into life in the woods.
    • RE: brother...
      Your definition of sprawl is the next development after yours. I'm sure those there before you complained about your house, and so on and so on. Choosing a location between Fishers & Noblesville may have not been the wisest decision if you were looking for green space to remain.

    Post a comment to this blog

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

    2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

    3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

    4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

    5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.