Long-vacant Carmel restaurant to become pet center

May 30, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Plans are in the works to transform the former Lotus Garden restaurant in Carmel into a veterinary clinic with a pet spa, boarding facilities and a future bark park.

Veterinarian Anthony Buzzetti is seeking city approval to renovate the distinctive building at 1085 N. Range Line Road (inside and out) for use as a “companion animal medical/wellness center.” A later phase would replace parking with a play area for pets.

Lotus Garden, CarmelThe distinctive roof "wings" on the former Lotus Garden are set to be removed. (IBJ photo)

The 9,600-square-foot facility also will offer dog training, Buzzetti told a Carmel Plan Commission committee this month.

Architect Shawn Curran plans to replace the green metal roof with asphalt shingles. Laminated beams along the roof line will remain, he told committee members, but the “wings” that give the building an Asian flair are set to be removed. He also plans to add a dormer above the entrance vestibule.

An existing house at the rear of the 4-acre site will be remodeled and used to store equipment.

Buzzetti is purchasing the long-vacant property from North Hill Realty LLC. Located at the north end of Range Line just south of Clay Terrace, its assessed value is $1.4 million.

Construction is expected to begin as soon as the Plan Commission OKs the site plan and design.

Two other Buzzetti facilities in Carmel—a medical center at 1455 S. Range Line Road and a wellness center at 12750 Horseferry Road—will remain open, CEO Hal Bond told IBJ.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Really?
    A Chinese restaurant turns into a vet clinic?! Sounds like a SNL skit!
  • Great Idea!
    This property has been vacant for way too long (no pun intended!) Love the new plans for this site!
  • FINALLY!!!
    So glad something is finally going to happen with this space. It is a bit of an eyesore and it needed to either be torn down or somehow developed long long ago!
  • Dog Wash?
    Convenient location for a boarding facility. Would be great if they also put in a few dog-wash stations (for DIYers to come in and use at a reasonable price).
  • Awesome idea
    Sounds great! Hope it is affordable. Be great to have the play area for small dogs to come visit. I board my Min Pin sometimes to travel and places get a little expensive. Hope it works out because my Min Pin deserves the best!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT