City seeks to keep Carmel's Monon Greenway green

June 20, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel wants to rezone more than 130 properties along the Monon Greenway north of 96th Street, a move leaders say will protect the tree-lined trail from future development.

If approved by the Carmel Clay Plan Commission and City Council, the so-called overlay zone would prohibit any commercial, industrial or multifamily construction within 88 feet of the trail’s center line. Existing single-family uses would not be affected.

The purpose of the change “is to maintain the natural and residential character that is currently enjoyed along the trail,” according to a staff report.

As proposed, the “natural section south” restrictions would apply from 96th Street to just south of Carmel Drive. The city adopted a similar measure regulating trailside development north of its Arts & Design District in 2012.

Officials waited to rezone the southern section because of the expense of notifying adjacent property owners, planning administrator Adrienne Keeling told the Carmel Clay Plan Commission this week. The city sent about 900 letters to neighbors in advance of a June 17 public hearing, she said.

Despite assurances from staff that the zoning change would not limit their activities, several property owners spoke out against the proposal, saying it restricts their rights.

Commission members tried to assuage their fears.

“We’re not taking anything,” said Kevin “Woody” Rider, who also serves on City Council. “I guarantee that.”

The rezoning proposal comes as developers work on plans for a pair of projects on either side of the Monon just north of 96th Street.

M/I Homes is seeking approval to build a 43-home neighborhood dubbed Monon Lake on heavily wooded property west of the trail. The single-family project likely would not be affected by any zoning change.

But Old Town Development LLC may have to consider the implications on its plans to transform the former Sunrise Golf Club into a residential community targeting empty-nesters. As IBJ reported last month, that project likely will include a multifamily component.

Members of the commission’s subdivision committee are expected to review the rezoning proposal July 1.

  • Heres hoping
    Let's hope this plan gets approved without any issues. It would be a shame to lose this environment. I live very close to the Monon and enjoy being able to run and bike in the shade on hot days.
  • Guarantee?
    Mr. Rider uses the term "guarantee" too loosely. He is but one member of the council, and he can't guarantee anything for the future. He also guaranteed that Illinois would be completed prior to the bridges construction, and the 31 construction. How has that panned out?

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.