Odd behavior at Old National

April 8, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lots of big news is swirling in banking circles these days, including what might become of financially challenged National City Bank.

But a small piece of unusual news that unfolded yesterday is generating about as much talk locally.

Old National Bancorp announced that a former loan officer in Indianapolis had forged loan documents. But the bank doesnâ??t seem to know why the officer did it.

No money was skimmed. The borrowers were legitimate businesses that had sought the loans and presumably would have been given their money without the need for forged signatures.

Whatâ??s more, the borrowers didnâ??t even know the signatures had been forged.

Maybe an FBI investigation that started recently will turn up more.

Old National isnâ??t releasing the name of the employee, who was fired, but CEO Bob Jones says heâ??s utterly mystified about what might have motivated the officer to engage in misconduct.

What do you think?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • As the saying goes, Follow the money. Today's corporate world is full of greed. While the ONB situation is apparently all about an individual motivated by greed of some sort, the people at the helm at National City should be held accountable for the decisions they made to turn a mighty banking power into a piece of rubble. When they sell, who stands to make the most from the disaster? Those at the top who should share the spoils of their dastardly deeds (leaving them with even greater losses in their portfolios) with their minions that will undoubtedly lose their jobs with little to show for all the hard work they've done over the years.

    Let us hope that the FBI uncovers the true intent. Surely, it's all about the money.
  • Follow the money...ONB concurrently announced a $17 million reserve for bad loans and a reduction in anticipated EPS. This looks and sounds like a cover-up of something else that was mismanaged. This was a convenient excuse for a write-off.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT