Offers pour in for First Indiana Plaza

August 28, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
First Indiana PlazaA sluggish real estate market hasn't deterred investment groups interested in owning the 31-story First Indiana Plaza. Brokers say the New York-based owners of the struggling skyscraper have received about 10 offers for the 425,000-square-foot office building. The owners, Crown Properties Inc., have rejected several of the offers and are evaluating others. The finalist offers are in the $32-$38 million range. There was no official asking price, and brokers say a $60-million figure listed by CoStar Property is not accurate. Some local bidders, including a group that includes Situs Realty Corp., are among the finalists, brokers said. Situs has done sales and leasing for Republic Development's Saxony project. Officials with Crown Properties could not be reached, and Situs President Keith Stark declined to comment.


A condo conversion? In the offering materials for the building, the owners tout the tower's upper floors as a candidate for condo conversion. The intention is to show some upside for a building that could be 70 percent empty after Bose McKinney & Evans leaves in September 2008. But local real estate veterans say a conversion would be cost prohibitive. What do you think?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • YEAH! The World's Largest Starbucks
  • It does kind of look like a venti latte.
  • I have a hard time believing this would stay empty for long. It's such a great location right next to the remodeled City Market. I don't think it should be converted to condos at all with all the other condo projects going on downtown right now. Just a good olf fashion office building.
  • I can't wait 'til they get rid of the First Indiana signage. It's ugly and dated. The building will look much nicer without it.
  • Prior to One Indiana Sq being sold (right after the NBD/Bank One Merger) there was also talk of making that building a mixed-use tower. For this tower, I think it makes sense now. yes, it may be somewhat cost-prohibitive, in the sense who ever buys it probably doesn't want to sink much money into it. That doesn't mean it can't/shouldn't be done. To me, anything to lower our high office vacancy rates, is a win. Especially if it is a conversion of newer Class-A space to a mixed-use tower. Indy is lagging behind our neighbors when it comes to truely mixed-use towers and high-rise residential living. If this is successful, the mantra that Indy can't support highrise living can finally be flushed down the drain.

    However, saying all of this, it makes me hope that the Consolidated Building, which is just south of First Indinana, is able to be purchased by someone with deep pockets to convert that to apartments.
  • Good point, Ablerock. Hadn't thought about it. Check out the M&I logo here: http://www.mibank.com/mibanknew/index.html

    What do you think: An improvement over First Indiana?
  • I'm thinking IKEA, or a strip club. Or maybe a shooting range.
  • ^^^ damn, now that is a very wide range of possibilities!
  • A giant homeless shelter is what downtown desperately needs.
  • I like how Indiana is on the sign tho... Makes it more local, ya know?

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT