Officials express confidence in Indy 500 security plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Motor Speedway officials and Indiana State Police say they are confident in their security plan for this year's Indianapolis 500 and won't remove trash cans from the track in response to deadly blasts at the Boston Marathon.

State police Sgt. Brian Olehy said during a news conference Tuesday that officers will conduct frequent security sweeps of garbage cans but won't remove them because doing so would pose a health hazard.

Speedway spokesman Doug Boles said about 60 people met Tuesday to discuss how to respond to an incident like the Boston bombings. He said the exercise was one of dozens of public safety meetings held each year.

The exercise included public safety officials and representatives from hospitals and the National Weather Service.

The Indianapolis 500 is May 26.


  • The Only Thing We Have To Fear Is Fear Itself
    One sure sign the Indianapolis 500 is as strong as ever is the willful hostility and selective ignorance of a handful of critics who obsessively trip over themselves to offer mostly off-topic commentary about it. That's too bad. I am also not personally worried about the potential shenanigans of mayhem causers either. The news media does a great job of whipping the public up into a scared frenzy over random acts of violence but if we worry about bombs and terrorism they win. I've been going for 48 years and won't stop now.
  • Actually
    The only place the Indy 500 is the number one sporting event in the world is on their own Wiki. In fact, if you check out the Forbes list of top 10 sporting events, it doesn't even make the list, but the Daytona 500 does. Sorry. And, we are, in fact, giving the IMS taxpayer monies to the tune of $100 million. You can read about it right on this very site. Sorry, again.
  • User tax
    Ummm....you do realize the money for the speedway is mostly coming from a $1 fee imposed on speedway event tickets and from racino taxes. All other money is from a new TIF district. IMS has brought more tax money to the state than the state could ever repay to IMS. Also still the LARGEST 1 day sporting even in the WORLD. Be proud of your community assets and Get a clue.
  • Speedball? Hairball!
    They're still running the 500? Who knew? Nobody has cared about this race for decades now, and I figured with their taxpayer bailout that they might not even run this year. It's just a matter of time before the track is sold and redeveloped into apartments for upwardly mobile gay couples. Perhaps there will be a wedding chapel as well. Doesn't matter. I don't support businesses that demand taxpayer bailouts and anyone who does really isn't worth protecting. Just my 2 cents.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.